We ran a quick user test and found that more people were signing up with their emails
If you trust your test, then you should trust your users and design a solution that meets their desires.
We are trying to encourage users to connect with their Facebook/Twitter accounts instead
Why is that? Do you have sound reasoning behind this in that it will ...
Be transparent with your users.
I would include a message that communicates two things:
The application did its job successfully
Facebook imposes this "inconvenient" requirement
Perhaps something along the lines of:
We successfully found 105 posts that match this criteria.
In order to keep your account safe, Facebook doesn't allow 3rd-party ...
The only advantage that I see as a user (for sites that I don't actually want to use in combination with twitter/facebook) is that it is quicker to log in with an existing account.
As such you may want to structure it like so:
Log in with existing account (can be social media or email)
Register new account
Provide a regular register method
In a comment to your question I said that I wouldn't use your app if the only way to register is via social networks. The reasons vary from person to person and to not make this answer go off-topic too much I'll give you just a quick outline about some issues:
Simple but relevant: I don't use the famous networks
I don't ...
I recommend not restricting to jpeg only:
Social media sites (usually) rely on people creating profiles and becoming active on the site. If at any point it becomes a pain to create a profile, users won't do it. If they have only a .png, they likely aren't going to go create a .jpeg to create a profile unless there is a huge incentive for them to continue. ...
Most users will recognize the logo mark for the social media platforms they use, so additional explanatory text for each icon would be overkill. If you do feel like users might need some additional context, you could use tooltips to display extra text on mouse hover.
The current placement of your social icons seems random. It looks like you placed them in ...
I generally avoid signing up to random websites with Facebook, because I don't want those sites posting junk to my Facebook profile. One recent exception was Fallen London, which has a link saying "Read our civilised social media policy" right next to the "create a free account" -> "sign in with Facebook" link. The linked policy says things like "It's your ...
It is perhaps not necessary to write out the label Facebook or Twitter next to the icon as Chris stated in his previous answer.
But, please explain why I should follow you on Facebook. Is it for getting great discounts? Is it because you post new outfits that I can use for inspiration? Is it because I no longer need to go to your web site for updates?
Facebook have follow feature if the user have set her account to allow followers. Followers only see posts that the followed user posts publicly. The main difference is that both parties have acknowledge that there is a friend relationship. One sends a friend request – the other accept (or decline) the request. But to follow someone – there is only one party ...
"companies put in fake links all the time, it makes it look like there's more there."
That's about the dumbest thing I've heard, no offense.
Visitors aren't dumb and shouldn't be treated as such. Only one thing will happen when a visitor finds out that you are lying to them: they will simply leave and never come back.
I suggest you do 1 of 2 things: 1) ...
I'm not sure about data on desktop design, but I can say that for mobile devices, people will often use the social media login option when it is presented.
This article about mobile interaction and behavior tells us the following:
SOCIAL LOGIN: While roughly half of the people who participate in our research say they don't like – or want – to make use of ...
Tania Lang on her article Content Sharing and Social Networking Buttons, concluded the following based on scant research data :
Ensure share buttons are subtle and contextual.
Don’t include them below your H1 page heading. Give your poor users a chance to read something before they decide to share it. Shoving all
the buttons in their faces is ...
I trust facebook.com (sort of), so I put information on there such as my likes. I don't trust just any old site I stumble across on the Internet. So there's no way that I'm going to register for your application with my Facebook account.
However, after some use, I may find that I do trust your application. Then I might be ready to click "Connect with ...
For your specific question on which social logins to use, it depends on your users/market.
However, Facebook is by far and away the most important one, followed by Google. Then a mix of Twitter, LinkedIn and Yahoo.
lot of the prominent social websites do have options to close or memoralize an account if a person dies. To quote this article
Facebook: To report someone as deceased, Facebook requires documentation, such as a copy of the deceased's death certificate.
Upon request, Facebook will "memorialise" the user's page, allowing
friends and family to post ...
We used social plugin for couple of our products for login.
To answer your first question, the simple advantage is that the user need not enter his credentials every time he/she signs in to your app. Most of the times the user is already logged into FB / google etc and can use the same to sign into your app too.
A large percentage of users turn away when ...
On Instagram, posting clickable links on comments are not enabled, The move was taken to crack down on people excessively using self-promotional links in the comments to the extent of spammng.. Instagram’s taking a proactive approach to cutting out spam, and has measures in place to stop people from sharing the same comment on multiple photos as well.
The short answer is it depends. On a basic website with a handful of pages, breadcrumbs are certainly unnecessary. But on larger sites (especially reference and documentation sites), breadcrumbs are extremely useful for navigation and orientation—one might even say they're downright necessary. The hard part is determining whether your site is large enough to ...
I don't understand why you want to change the user habit for the sign up? (business goals?) Sign up with social media is just an alternative for the user.
Moreover, your test tells you that your users prefer email. Maybe, you would have to ask users why they prefer this solution instead of social media accounts? Maybe you don't use the good social media ...
The methods of registration you provide define your addressable market of users.
Whichever option you provide your users, you are hoping for two things:
They actually have that sign in method.
They trust you with having access to the method they choose.
Do they have the sign in method?
Think about your market of users and if they'll have these methods. ...
It sounds like you're on the right track with positive reinforcement, though, it is really hard to encourage people to be pioneers with zero content, zero activity and an unknown wait time.
In your specific situation I would suggest giving more options to the user...
Here's a little demo of a more generic example
Users could click on an empty heart to ...
Your decision should also be informed other factors:
how much you desire to encourage that behavior
how dense/sparse the information on screen already is
how many social networks you plan to provide links for
how does the interaction match up to similar interactions in your product and what patterns have already been established
how much traffic you want ...
It has two goals/benefits; it clearly separates those who have reached 500 from everyone who has not, and makes sure the quality of connections stays high. It's a mixture of prestige (you have a well developed social circle) and functionality; it becomes more and more likely people unknown to you are at least a 2nd or 3rd connection. So, 500+ group is like a ...
That is a subject that has being discussed many times and the answer depends on your perspective. The most common consensus is to open anything that is not your website in a new tab or window.
If you want to read about the reasons for that, or the opposite option, you can check the answer I wrote on the question When (if ever) should links be opened in a ...
However it might be done, logging in and signing up are two different things. The sign up path is almost certainly more complex than the login path, regardless of whether social login or a more traditional login are used.
These crucial differences are not negated just because the technology allows the process to be done in one click.
For example, you may ...
Only using these big social media authentication accounts to sign into your website aimed at students/young people will work fine.
However lets think about the users who dont have a gmail twitter or facebook. You should put a section in there for them. Dont have a twitter/gmail/hotmail? sign up for one here. Suggest them to sign up for one that takes the ...
(In social media and the internet)
Follow is a subset of Friend.
When you add someone as a Friend, you automatically follow that person, and they automatically follow you (under the assumption the friend request was accepted).
Most social websites, offer a service titled Follow. This means exactly what it says—you will subscribe to updates ...
The best way to show the message is in a simple, informal way with words that speak to the domain, rather than the technology or medium.
For instance, if this message is in response to a user searching posts for a specific subject, the message could be something like this:
There aren't any conversations on this topic.
If you wanted to get cute, you ...
Do it the linked in way. Have a progress bar, showing how much their profile is complete. Gamify it or provide rewards (if possible) as and when users complete their profiles.
So, you could have the user land on your main & important landing page after onboarding. Where, the user could the progress bar.