New price = reduced price
Old price = old, bigger price
This is how i see the process:
- See New price
- Evaluate option to buy
- See Old price
- Evaluate option to buy with price difference as incentive.
--
- See Old price
- No need to evaluate option to buy - price not effective
- See New price
- Evaluate option to buy with price difference as incentive.
Based on my logic, emphasizing the reduced prize should get a better result. I mostly see in online shops this done the other way around, including Amazon. Why is it better the other to focus on the new smaller price?