Timeline for How do you test navigation engagement?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2015 at 12:38 | answer | added | Ken Mohnkern | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 20, 2015 at 16:44 | answer | added | Devin | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 20, 2015 at 13:55 | answer | added | Jan | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Nov 20, 2015 at 13:25 | history | suggested | louvaro |
just added more tags related to navigation and user testing
|
|
| Nov 20, 2015 at 12:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 20, 2015 at 13:25 | |||||
| Oct 30, 2014 at 0:48 | comment | added | Cameron Wu | Sure. I'm working on a finance web app. It's not intended to be fully responsive, although some adjustments for smaller screen sizes are planned. Our 25th percentile screen size is 1280 wide. I would agree with you that a top navigation is by far the most conventional navigation pattern - the conclusion came from past experiences which drove a fear of an "out of sight out of mind" behavior. Hamburger menus are an obvious extreme. The concern is that left nav columns have more area and thus more "top of mind" visibility and result in more exploration. | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 23:03 | comment | added | dennislees | What are you working on? A website? Web app? Desktop application? Is there a mobile/responsive concern here? When it comes to major stuff like this, it's often possible to rely on experience initially (and not carry out large/complex tests) especially when you're asking a forum full of UXers. But a bit more context is needed. Like the questions above. While your at it, it might be helpful to know how you all came to the conclusion that the amount of engagement with a horizontal nav bar at the top of a screen would be questionable? It might be one of the most conventional patterns we have. | |
| Oct 29, 2014 at 22:37 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 29, 2014 at 23:00 | |||||
| Oct 29, 2014 at 22:32 | history | asked | Cameron Wu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |