Timeline for Evidence for The Broken Window Theory in UX?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Sep 7, 2017 at 12:47 | history | bounty ended | daniel.sedlacek | ||
S Sep 7, 2017 at 12:47 | history | notice removed | daniel.sedlacek | ||
Sep 7, 2017 at 12:44 | vote | accept | daniel.sedlacek | ||
Sep 7, 2017 at 11:56 | vote | accept | daniel.sedlacek | ||
Sep 7, 2017 at 11:56 | |||||
Sep 7, 2017 at 11:55 | answer | added | daniel.sedlacek | timeline score: 0 | |
Aug 31, 2017 at 23:56 | answer | added | Michael Lai♦ | timeline score: 0 | |
Aug 31, 2017 at 22:44 | comment | added | scunliffe | It may not apply to UX but it certainly applies to code. The more broken the code, the more you see less care to fix it and hacks applied to it. It becomes: "well if no one else cares... why should I" | |
Aug 30, 2017 at 22:49 | answer | added | bobtato | timeline score: 9 | |
Aug 30, 2017 at 22:34 | answer | added | Devin | timeline score: 4 | |
Aug 30, 2017 at 21:26 | answer | added | Jim Ryan | timeline score: 2 | |
S Aug 30, 2017 at 19:17 | history | bounty started | daniel.sedlacek | ||
S Aug 30, 2017 at 19:17 | history | notice added | daniel.sedlacek | Authoritative reference needed | |
Aug 28, 2017 at 21:51 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackUX/status/902287586940424192 | ||
Aug 28, 2017 at 19:11 | comment | added | Alan | I think you are justified in giving a lower mark--small details of an experience are just as important as the overall function. Interesting theory. | |
Aug 28, 2017 at 18:42 | comment | added | DasBeasto | Not going to formulate an answer yet but it's related to building trust. If they lose your trust early on you'll be hesitant to provide personal info such as to book a flight later on. See: nngroup.com/articles/commitment-levels | |
Aug 28, 2017 at 17:08 | history | edited | daniel.sedlacek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
grammar
|
Aug 28, 2017 at 16:57 | history | asked | daniel.sedlacek | CC BY-SA 3.0 |