Skip to main content
added 38 characters in body
Source Link
Alvaro
  • 16.9k
  • 7
  • 45
  • 68

The graph displayed is wider than the screen width and a scrollbar would probably be more intuitive.

However, if the solution you need is with buttons, instead of thinking about percentages I would think ofabout units. For example, a unit the user can move could be the full width of the screen. Similarly to how Netflix makes the user scroll horizontally:

Netflix scroll

When you click the right arrow, the screen moves all its width (3 images in this case) to the right. There is also a reference for how many of these screens there are (top right).

A secondary button for moving less distance would translate the graph one element only (this"one element" depends on your graph and what it is displaying). In the case of the Netflix scroller it would move one image at a time.

The graph displayed is wider than the screen width and a scrollbar would probably be more intuitive.

However, if the solution you need is with buttons, instead of thinking about percentages I would think of units. For example, a unit the user can move could be the full width of the screen. Similarly to how Netflix makes the user scroll horizontally:

Netflix scroll

When you click the right arrow, the screen moves all its width (3 images in this case) to the right. There is also a reference for how many of these screens there are (top right).

A secondary button for moving less distance would translate the graph one element only (this depends on your graph). In the case of the Netflix scroller it would move one image at a time.

The graph displayed is wider than the screen width and a scrollbar would probably be more intuitive.

However, if the solution you need is with buttons, instead of thinking about percentages I would think about units. For example, a unit the user can move could be the full width of the screen. Similarly to how Netflix makes the user scroll horizontally:

Netflix scroll

When you click the right arrow, the screen moves all its width (3 images in this case) to the right. There is also a reference for how many of these screens there are (top right).

A secondary button for moving less distance would translate the graph one element only ("one element" depends on your graph and what it is displaying). In the case of the Netflix scroller it would move one image at a time.

added 24 characters in body
Source Link
Alvaro
  • 16.9k
  • 7
  • 45
  • 68

The graph displayed is wider than the screen width and a scrollbar would probably be more intuitive.

However, instead if the solution you wantneed is with buttons, instead of thinking about percentages I would think of units. AFor example, a unit youthe user can move could be the full width of the screen. Similarly to how Netflix makes the user scroll horizontally:

Netflix scroll

When you click the right arrow, the screen moves all its width (3 images in this case) to the right. There is also a reference for how many of these screens there are (top right).

A secondary button for moving less distance would translate the graph one element only (this depends on your graph). In the case of the Netflix scroller it would move one image at a time.

The graph displayed is wider than the screen width and a scrollbar would probably be more intuitive.

However, instead if the solution you want is buttons, instead of thinking about percentages I would think of units. A unit you can move could be the full width of the screen. Similarly to how Netflix makes the user scroll horizontally:

Netflix scroll

When you click the right arrow, the screen moves all its width (3 images in this case) to the right. There is also a reference for how many of these screens there are (top right).

A secondary button for moving less would translate the graph one element only (this depends on your graph). In the case of the Netflix scroller it would move one image at a time.

The graph displayed is wider than the screen width and a scrollbar would probably be more intuitive.

However, if the solution you need is with buttons, instead of thinking about percentages I would think of units. For example, a unit the user can move could be the full width of the screen. Similarly to how Netflix makes the user scroll horizontally:

Netflix scroll

When you click the right arrow, the screen moves all its width (3 images in this case) to the right. There is also a reference for how many of these screens there are (top right).

A secondary button for moving less distance would translate the graph one element only (this depends on your graph). In the case of the Netflix scroller it would move one image at a time.

Source Link
Alvaro
  • 16.9k
  • 7
  • 45
  • 68

The graph displayed is wider than the screen width and a scrollbar would probably be more intuitive.

However, instead if the solution you want is buttons, instead of thinking about percentages I would think of units. A unit you can move could be the full width of the screen. Similarly to how Netflix makes the user scroll horizontally:

Netflix scroll

When you click the right arrow, the screen moves all its width (3 images in this case) to the right. There is also a reference for how many of these screens there are (top right).

A secondary button for moving less would translate the graph one element only (this depends on your graph). In the case of the Netflix scroller it would move one image at a time.