Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
Alternatives for different actions
5
votes
3
answers
515
views
When is configurable options/settings a bad thing in the context of admin/super-users?
My view is that in a setting where the user is a super-user who requires many options, more options in itself, if it is made intuitive and clear, is not a problem. … Here are some of my thoughts on when more options become a problem:
When options are affected by many other (unknown) options and itself
affects yet a bunch of other (unknown) options it becomes a usability …