Timeline for At what point does a user lose trust in a Busy Spinner?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 19, 2016 at 4:36 | comment | added | Nick Coad | @PhillipW I agree with your conclusion, but I disagree that you arrived at it empirically as you suggest. For that you would need to have actually gone out and collected data on this from a statistically significant sample group and analysed it. | |
| S Sep 16, 2016 at 20:25 | history | suggested | dberm22 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling of looses to loses
|
| Sep 16, 2016 at 18:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 16, 2016 at 20:25 | |||||
| Sep 15, 2016 at 13:06 | history | edited | Pierre.Sassoulas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Thanks to David Conrad comment
|
| Sep 15, 2016 at 7:00 | comment | added | David Conrad | It's called a Progress bar, not a Progression bar, and as a user I don't trust them at all. They lie. They're just ugly horizontal spinners. Tell me what steps are being performed. | |
| Sep 14, 2016 at 5:37 | comment | added | PhillipW | I think you have to do a 'reality check' on things. There's a state of mind where you can step back from living 'automatically' and observe yourself and your interactions with the external world. It's what I call 'sample of one', but it gives you hypotheses which you can then test using a bigger sample. | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 17:33 | comment | added | Rhymoid | @PhillipW If you're measuring your own feelings while being aware that you're testing this, it's not a good empirical test. | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 10:04 | history | edited | Pierre.Sassoulas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed genre
|
| Sep 13, 2016 at 9:26 | history | edited | Pierre.Sassoulas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 57 characters in body
|
| Sep 12, 2016 at 19:11 | history | edited | Pierre.Sassoulas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Adressing the 10 seconds we see everywhere
|
| Sep 12, 2016 at 16:10 | comment | added | PhillipW | I'm voting for 5 seconds not 10. Its an empirical test you can do yourself by timing yourself looking at a screen. Check your feelings as the clock ticks. 10 seconds can feel like a long time. The appearance of a progression bar is basically telling the user 'This could take a while, so why not go and do something else for a while' By telling them early you reduce their tendency to build up frustration on the >5second interactions. | |
| Sep 12, 2016 at 12:06 | history | edited | Pierre.Sassoulas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Sourced
|
| Sep 12, 2016 at 11:55 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 12, 2016 at 12:45 | |||||
| Sep 12, 2016 at 11:54 | history | answered | Pierre.Sassoulas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |