Skip to main content

Timeline for Down arrow and up arrow status

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 30, 2016 at 7:05 comment added Albert Renshaw @AbhishekSharma sounds like feedback form an employer at this point. I think the first example is a better way to go but if your employer rejected this already then I'm not sure what you can do, good luck; I'm out of ideas haha. I liked this answer (with color however): ux.stackexchange.com/a/94809/27140
May 30, 2016 at 6:10 vote accept Abhishek Sharma
May 30, 2016 at 6:10
May 30, 2016 at 6:09 comment added Abhishek Sharma @AlbertRenshaw second example looks like a slider.
May 30, 2016 at 2:41 history edited Albert Renshaw CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
May 30, 2016 at 2:41 comment added Albert Renshaw Okay so 95%, I'll edit that in haha. Thanks. Edit: then again if 95% is not color blind, we are still only dealing with the percentage that is not red-green color blind, so it might even be closer to 97%, but who knows.
May 30, 2016 at 2:34 comment added Bevan Depending the source, colour vision deficiencies affect between 8-10% of males and 1-2% of females; a lot more than the 99% you mention.
May 28, 2016 at 8:05 comment added Abhishek Sharma @AlbertRenshaw This looks nice. :)
May 27, 2016 at 19:21 comment added Albert Renshaw @AbhishekSharma I've edited a demo into my answer above
May 27, 2016 at 19:20 history edited Albert Renshaw CC BY-SA 3.0
added 404 characters in body
May 27, 2016 at 19:15 comment added Albert Renshaw If color is an issue perhaps you could use a non-colorBased performance indicator, like this one I just sketched (see link at end of comment). Middle is neutural or "average" preformance. To the right is over-preforming, to the left is underpreforming: imgur.com/PgtyECh .
May 27, 2016 at 11:24 comment added Abhishek Sharma One thing which might have problem will be the colors. Thats the main issue in this case.
May 27, 2016 at 5:02 history edited Albert Renshaw CC BY-SA 3.0
added 219 characters in body
May 27, 2016 at 4:56 comment added Albert Renshaw @shortstheory I agree, I guess what's important now is who the user is of this app. I develop apps for casual users looking for entertainment so simplicity and aesthetics are key to me. This seems, however, to be a business facing app, to a business-consumer more information may be a better user experience. (Unfortunately at the cost of aesthetics) I'm curious to see if anyone else comes up with a more elegant way of doing this!
May 27, 2016 at 4:22 comment added shortstheory This does solve the problem, but it does look information heavy at the same time.
May 26, 2016 at 8:17 history answered Albert Renshaw CC BY-SA 3.0