Timeline for Down arrow and up arrow status
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 30, 2016 at 7:05 | comment | added | Albert Renshaw | @AbhishekSharma sounds like feedback form an employer at this point. I think the first example is a better way to go but if your employer rejected this already then I'm not sure what you can do, good luck; I'm out of ideas haha. I liked this answer (with color however): ux.stackexchange.com/a/94809/27140 | |
May 30, 2016 at 6:10 | vote | accept | Abhishek Sharma | ||
May 30, 2016 at 6:10 | |||||
May 30, 2016 at 6:09 | comment | added | Abhishek Sharma | @AlbertRenshaw second example looks like a slider. | |
May 30, 2016 at 2:41 | history | edited | Albert Renshaw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
May 30, 2016 at 2:41 | comment | added | Albert Renshaw | Okay so 95%, I'll edit that in haha. Thanks. Edit: then again if 95% is not color blind, we are still only dealing with the percentage that is not red-green color blind, so it might even be closer to 97%, but who knows. | |
May 30, 2016 at 2:34 | comment | added | Bevan | Depending the source, colour vision deficiencies affect between 8-10% of males and 1-2% of females; a lot more than the 99% you mention. | |
May 28, 2016 at 8:05 | comment | added | Abhishek Sharma | @AlbertRenshaw This looks nice. :) | |
May 27, 2016 at 19:21 | comment | added | Albert Renshaw | @AbhishekSharma I've edited a demo into my answer above | |
May 27, 2016 at 19:20 | history | edited | Albert Renshaw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 404 characters in body
|
May 27, 2016 at 19:15 | comment | added | Albert Renshaw | If color is an issue perhaps you could use a non-colorBased performance indicator, like this one I just sketched (see link at end of comment). Middle is neutural or "average" preformance. To the right is over-preforming, to the left is underpreforming: imgur.com/PgtyECh . | |
May 27, 2016 at 11:24 | comment | added | Abhishek Sharma | One thing which might have problem will be the colors. Thats the main issue in this case. | |
May 27, 2016 at 5:02 | history | edited | Albert Renshaw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 219 characters in body
|
May 27, 2016 at 4:56 | comment | added | Albert Renshaw | @shortstheory I agree, I guess what's important now is who the user is of this app. I develop apps for casual users looking for entertainment so simplicity and aesthetics are key to me. This seems, however, to be a business facing app, to a business-consumer more information may be a better user experience. (Unfortunately at the cost of aesthetics) I'm curious to see if anyone else comes up with a more elegant way of doing this! | |
May 27, 2016 at 4:22 | comment | added | shortstheory | This does solve the problem, but it does look information heavy at the same time. | |
May 26, 2016 at 8:17 | history | answered | Albert Renshaw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |