Skip to main content

Timeline for Notify a user why nothing happened

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 16, 2016 at 5:50 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Oct 17, 2016 at 5:35 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Sep 17, 2016 at 12:11 comment added O. R. Mapper "Obviously, every person that has beta tested my software thinks something is broken." - they are right. Breaking certain functionality is the purpose of any content filtering software.
Sep 17, 2016 at 4:41 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Aug 19, 2016 at 16:51 history tweeted twitter.com/StackUX/status/766679087570190336
Aug 18, 2016 at 4:19 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Sep 2, 2015 at 14:39 answer added neopickaze timeline score: 0
Sep 2, 2015 at 13:43 answer added Alex timeline score: 0
Sep 2, 2015 at 10:46 answer added whybird timeline score: 1
Sep 1, 2015 at 17:15 comment added user71831 @KenMohnkern I can parse and inspect html as it comes in so I could theoretically run all of the adblock plus filters on the html and remove the elements, I'm just trying to avoid actually modifying other peoples websites. I realize it's a tough problem and appreciate your time thinking about it. I'm starting to think a browser addon that simply flashes the icon or something is the least invasive and annoying way to give feedback.
Sep 1, 2015 at 17:07 comment added Ken Mohnkern I'm still trying to prevent the user from clicking things that don't do anything. Can you add a visual of some sort to the unclickable items? (I avoid clicking any Google results that have their little "Ad" icon.)
Sep 1, 2015 at 16:15 comment added user71831 @tonytrucco the filter gracefully fails the http transaction as to avoid interrupting user experience as little as possible. So for example a user searches something, but the top 3 are sponsored links that have tracking code attached. The user doesn't know this but has the option enabled to not allow such connections. He clicks, nothing happens, blames me. lol I know it's crazy but even though they installed it, they configured it, this is how they view it: like it's broken, not doing its job. This is the problem I have, they have no feedback.
Sep 1, 2015 at 16:13 comment added user71831 @KenMohnkern I'm trying to avoid modifying "the service". I could pilfer through the html etc delivered to the end user and remove everything that would be a blocked link, but then I'm transparently modifying the service which might mess up someone elses delivered service and plus there are legal concerns with that.
Sep 1, 2015 at 15:40 comment added tonytrucco Can you give a few more details on what exactly is going on? Is the filter refusing an action because it would result in 0 hits?
Sep 1, 2015 at 14:39 comment added Ken Mohnkern If the system knows ahead of time which commands will result in no action, why not disable those commands? Better to prevent user confusion than to explain things afterward.
Sep 1, 2015 at 11:42 review First posts
Sep 1, 2015 at 11:45
Sep 1, 2015 at 11:38 history asked user71831 CC BY-SA 3.0