Timeline for Adding a "none of the above" option to a list of checkboxes
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2014 at 22:31 | history | edited | Izhaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Nov 16, 2014 at 17:54 | history | edited | Izhaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
| Nov 13, 2014 at 11:58 | history | edited | Izhaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added tick all to the interface
|
| Nov 13, 2014 at 10:45 | comment | added | Jason A. | @AdamStone aka a "None of the Above" button :) Part humour, but also consider the heuristic of mapping UI to real world | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 1:37 | comment | added | Adam Stone | @Izhaki "It's an example where business goals win over usability" Agreed :) | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 1:22 | comment | added | Izhaki | @AdamStone You can always provide a 'Mark all as No' button. | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 1:21 | comment | added | Izhaki | I'm pretty sure the client requires explicit action for the 'No'. That's why I though more 'No's would mean for the client less 'I didn't pay notice'. It's an example where business goals win over usability. | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 1:20 | comment | added | Alejandro Veltri | You could select "No" as default answer for each one, unless the client has to specifically "denied" each option for some legal reason. | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 1:17 | comment | added | Adam Stone | This is definitely another way, but requires more clicks, which might be a tough sell to the client. Thanks :) | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 1:09 | history | answered | Izhaki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |