Timeline for Might a design be "too good" for users that expect a low price?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2014 at 19:53 | comment | added | Dmacatude | @Keavon, I'm not a diehard Apple fan, but to imply that they have never designed anything well is a stretch. | |
| Nov 12, 2014 at 18:55 | answer | added | Homer Simpson | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 12, 2014 at 16:43 | comment | added | Izkata | This question reminds me of Amazon.com - they had to keep "Sign in using our secure server" on the login button for certain pages to keep users from thinking "what, is it no longer secure?" | |
| Nov 12, 2014 at 16:37 | answer | added | David Mulder | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 12, 2014 at 10:12 | answer | added | Paul S | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 12, 2014 at 9:33 | answer | added | Andreas Johansson | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 12, 2014 at 9:24 | vote | accept | Renaud | ||
| S Nov 12, 2014 at 8:04 | history | suggested | Stephen Ostermiller | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling, grammar, punctuation
|
| Nov 12, 2014 at 8:00 | answer | added | Rasha | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 12, 2014 at 4:44 | answer | added | edgarator | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 11, 2014 at 23:48 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 12, 2014 at 8:04 | |||||
| Nov 11, 2014 at 13:34 | comment | added | Jason C | You can also have a great UX design that doesn't "look" great. UX and graphic design are separate; not completely separate, but not 100% connected. | |
| Nov 10, 2014 at 22:49 | comment | added | Keavon | Since when did Apple ever design things well? For them, it's the price that inspires a feel of luxury, not the quality of their product designs. As an indisputable example, their mice have always been terrible. | |
| Nov 10, 2014 at 20:42 | comment | added | DoubleDouble | The only time I can remember having this "worry", might be too strong of a word... slight suspicion might be better, is when I am looking at a very nice-looking site and I am expecting, or looking for, a free service/resource. However, I would go on and confirm that the site is actually looking for payment before I go elsewhere. It makes for a very good experience when I am pleasantly surprised. I don't think this applies to online stores though - where you will be paying for a product. | |
| Nov 10, 2014 at 19:54 | comment | added | vascowhite | @KenMohnkern Surely if they are delivering the message they want, then the design is good? | |
| Nov 10, 2014 at 16:42 | answer | added | glifchits | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 10, 2014 at 14:54 | comment | added | Ken Mohnkern | I've always suspected that this is why eBay has always been so ugly. They want to convey "bargain" and "discount" through bad design. | |
| Nov 10, 2014 at 14:36 | answer | added | PhillipW | timeline score: 22 | |
| Nov 10, 2014 at 11:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/531777828677632000 | ||
| Nov 10, 2014 at 11:54 | answer | added | AndroidHustle | timeline score: 43 | |
| Nov 10, 2014 at 10:33 | comment | added | Jimmery | This completely depends on what your definition of "Good" Design actually is. I believe that Good Design is not the same as a visually appealing style that may suggest affluence. | |
| Nov 10, 2014 at 10:15 | history | asked | Renaud | CC BY-SA 3.0 |