Timeline for 0 to 10 rating system alternative
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2014 at 15:33 | comment | added | Agi Hammerthief | @Tyzoid That still doesn't provide the user the option of chosing 0 (zero) if he/she actually wants to do that. At best, the choice is 1 and 1 != 0.0. An explicit 'skip' option would solve that. | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 14:25 | history | edited | Graham Herrli | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Aug 20, 2014 at 13:14 | comment | added | Tyzoid |
@mskfisher In theory, you can rate something half a star, bringing your count to 9. It depends on how it's measured. Is a 'zero stars' a skip? or a rating of 'zero'. Preferably, you'd have some sort of short description saying Rate us on how well we do. No stars means skip or something of that nature.
|
|
| Aug 20, 2014 at 13:09 | comment | added | mskfisher | +1, but as @DennisJaheruddin says, it implies an actual range of 1-5 (8 steps), rather than 0-5 (10 steps). | |
| Aug 20, 2014 at 10:21 | comment | added | Dennis Jaheruddin | The disadvantage here is that it is not that intuitive to understand whether leaving it blank means skip, or 0. | |
| Aug 19, 2014 at 13:33 | history | answered | Tyzoid | CC BY-SA 3.0 |