Skip to main content
22 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 27, 2021 at 7:15 history edited Graham Perrin CC BY-SA 4.0
Wayback Machine for the fedoraftw.com page.
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:32 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://ux.stackexchange.com/ with https://ux.stackexchange.com/
Aug 30, 2014 at 2:03 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/505536177160871936
Aug 29, 2014 at 12:54 vote accept Graham Perrin
Aug 29, 2014 at 10:33 answer added Graham Perrin timeline score: 4
S Aug 6, 2014 at 14:45 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Aug 6, 2014 at 14:45 history notice removed CommunityBot
Jul 30, 2014 at 6:48 comment added Graham Perrin … this is my first question here, but far from my first experience with UX. The essence of the question is comprised in the first paragraph – so I could happily remove the background section (including the personal opinion subsection) but that might be misconstrued as overreaction to commentary; it's not. Most remarkable: there's not yet an answer from someone with knowledge of design principles for Gnome/Gnome Web, or from someone with more general knowledge of where I might find the reference material. So I might take this to chat, for more guidance on improvement, but no rush.
Jul 30, 2014 at 6:35 comment added Graham Perrin Without wishing to stir any undue emotion: @JD my instinct is to discourage voting for that reason. In Meta Stack Overflow there's an accepted answer to a question that might apply in other parts of Stack Exchange: When is it preferred to UP-vote a question? … also, in UX meta: Is the ratio of upvotes to downvotes acceptable/healthy? – nothing amongst the answers suggests that I might be treated unfairly in the UX area. Voting practice aside: refocusing on the title and content of my question …
Jul 29, 2014 at 21:54 comment added Joshua Barron Unhelpful critique? This question would probably get closed if it weren't mechanically impossible due to the bounty on it. I am not saying the question is not well written or that Graham's heart is in the wrong place, just that this question appears to be off topic as currently written.
Jul 29, 2014 at 20:54 comment added JD. I upvoted specifically to counter-vote Joshua Barron's unhelpful critique.
Jul 29, 2014 at 19:02 comment added Graham Perrin Whilst I'm not averse to a change of title – to attract a broader audience – I'd like to avoid an over-focus on research … or authority. Perhaps the chat in IRC made reference to an archived e-mail list discussion (not necessarily in the epiphany or Gnome areas)? Perhaps the designers' own experience caused them to arrive at the current header bar design? And so on; I can only guess. Thanks again for commenting … maybe throw in (below) a suggested title or two, and I'll sleep on it, then build upon the suggested titles for a reword of the question.
Jul 29, 2014 at 18:49 comment added Joshua Barron If what you're really after is research about how usable different schemes for title/url display are, why not reword the question to be about that? Right now it's asking why a specific set of designers made a certain choice.
Jul 29, 2014 at 18:22 comment added Graham Perrin @JoshuaBarron thanks. I could have been more specific with the bounty … an authoritative answer would be great, but any answer other than my own will be appreciated. To a degree, I tried to avoid a leading question but here goes: I imagine that amongst the things that encouraged the developers to choose this design, there's research-based evidence to show that working without an immediately visible URL – and/or without a page title – can prove counter-productive. Maybe evidence to show how and why it's counterproductive? I guess, a UX expert will know of unbiased reference material.
Jul 29, 2014 at 17:21 comment added Joshua Barron This question is primarily opinion-based. Your answer is probably the best evidence anyone is ever going to get. And even with this information, what are you going to do with it? See ux.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask .
Jul 29, 2014 at 14:14 comment added Graham Perrin Please, can I have a comment to explain the down-vote? Thanks.
S Jul 29, 2014 at 13:30 history bounty started Graham Perrin
S Jul 29, 2014 at 13:30 history notice added Graham Perrin Draw attention
Jul 26, 2014 at 9:11 history edited Graham Perrin CC BY-SA 3.0
typo in title
Jul 26, 2014 at 9:08 answer added Graham Perrin timeline score: 1
Jul 26, 2014 at 8:45 review First posts
Jul 26, 2014 at 12:11
Jul 26, 2014 at 8:41 history asked Graham Perrin CC BY-SA 3.0