Return to Answer

Presuming that your links would be visually distinct from the description, then:

• title: definitely yes, because something has to be clickable.
• image: probably yes, because visitors might react to the image alone and never read the text.
• description: no way

Why no on description? Well, first, the more links you have on page, the more choices, the more overwhelmed the user, the less likely to make any decision. Second, the title would be less distinct from the body, diluting its use as a title. Finally, walls of text should not contain links.

If you want a link for the visitor to follow after having read the description, add a "Read more >>>" link.

Presuming that your links would be visually distinct from the description, then:

• title: definitely yes, because something has to be clickable.
• image: probably yes, because visitors might react to the image alone and never read the text.
• description: no way

Why no on description? Well, first, the more links you have on page, the more choices, the more overwhelmed the user, the less likely to make any decision. Second, the title would be indistinguishable from the body, diluting its effectiveness as a title. Finally, walls of text should not contain links.

If you want a link for the visitor to follow after having read the description, add a "Read more >>>" link.

Presuming that your links would be visually distinct from the description, then:

• title: definitely yes, because something has to be clickable.
• image: probably yes, because visitors might react to the image alone and never read the text.
• description: no way

Why no on description? Well, first, the more links you have a on page, the more choices, the more overwhelmed the user, the less likely to make any decision. Second, the title would be less distinct from the body, diluting its use as a title. Finally, walls of text should not contain links.

If you want a link for the visitor to follow after having read the description, add a "Read more >>>" link.

Presuming that your links would be visually distinct from the description, then:

• title: definitely yes, because something has to be clickable.
• image: probably yes, because visitors might react to the image alone and never read the text.
• description: no way

Why no on description? Well, first, the more links you have on page, the more choices, the more overwhelmed the user, the less likely to make any decision. Second, the title would be less distinct from the body, diluting its use as a title. Finally, walls of text should not contain links.

If you want a link for the visitor to follow after having read the description, add a "Read more >>>" link.

Presuming that your links are visually distinct, then:

• title: definitely
• image: probably
• description: no way

Title because something has to be clickable.

Image because people might like the image alone and want to find out more, without reading the text.

Description no, because walls of text should not contain links. Or, another reason: the more links you have a on page, the more choices, the more overwhelmed the user, the less likely to make any decision. Or another reason: the title would be less distinct from the body, diluting its use as a title. If you want something for after the user has read the description, add a "Read more >>>" link.

Presuming that your links would be visually distinct from the description, then:

• title: definitely yes, because something has to be clickable.
• image: probably yes, because visitors might react to the image alone and never read the text.
• description: no way

Why no on description? Well, first, the more links you have a on page, the more choices, the more overwhelmed the user, the less likely to make any decision. Second, the title would be less distinct from the body, diluting its use as a title. Finally, walls of text should not contain links.

If you want a link for the visitor to follow after having read the description, add a "Read more >>>" link.