Timeline for Multiple ways to show approval for an item
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2011 at 17:04 | vote | accept | JoJo | ||
| Mar 30, 2011 at 6:34 | comment | added | nathanvda | When i ask questions, i like to upvote answers that I respect the effort that went into it, or the alternative views. So as an asker it allows me to reward all people taking the effort of replying, and giving a valuable reply. | |
| Mar 27, 2011 at 15:44 | comment | added | johnny | Ah, I see your point. However I feel that it's better that the GUI is consistent. I feel it would add complexity for both the asker and the programmer if it were to work different ways depending on if you asked the question or somebody else. | |
| Mar 27, 2011 at 3:37 | comment | added | JoJo | I see the need for the community to use both voting and answer-marking, but I don't see the need for the question asker to use both. This is my UI concern. | |
| Mar 25, 2011 at 19:31 | comment | added | johnny | I'd like to address your question about why you can vote up/down an answer after it's accepted. Take for example a question where a person asks why he gets a warning on compiling. The first answer might say, disable warnings. Which would remove the warning. The asker might even accept it as an answer. It's still a bad answer and needs to get (down)votes. | |
| Mar 25, 2011 at 19:13 | answer | added | PedroC88 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 25, 2011 at 17:51 | history | asked | JoJo | CC BY-SA 2.5 |