Timeline for Should I give users the opportunity to give separate ratings for quality and interest?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2017 at 10:29 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 23, 2014 at 14:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
| S Jul 23, 2013 at 16:05 | history | suggested | Andrew Leach | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Formatted citations for ease of reading
|
| Jul 23, 2013 at 15:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 23, 2013 at 16:05 | |||||
| Jul 23, 2013 at 15:46 | comment | added | Pking | The problem is very clear now, thank you. I'm still curious about maybe turning difficulty and "friction" in trying to get a better assessment from the user can be turned into a positive experience - I'm looking into gamification concepts, where difficulty, conflict, failure, challenge etc. play an important role. Perhaps there are way to encouraging the user to better reason about their affective state through gamification concepts. | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 15:25 | comment | added | Rumi P. | @Pking please read the new version, it is very different from the old one and hopefully explains it better. As for better approaches for measuring satisfaction, the best explanation of the theory I know of is the Oliver book I cite. I have not looked into practical instruments too closely, because the theory convinced me to use the simple approach for my case. | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 15:22 | history | edited | Rumi P. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Completely rewrote it, because the old structure was very hard to read.
|
| Jul 23, 2013 at 15:16 | vote | accept | Pking | ||
| S Jul 23, 2013 at 15:12 | history | suggested | Andrew Leach | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Formatted citations for ease of reading
|
| Jul 23, 2013 at 14:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 23, 2013 at 15:12 | |||||
| Jul 23, 2013 at 14:54 | comment | added | Pking | "users will continue to confuse interest and quality, even when you ask them to rate them independently" damn users always making things difficult :) You have me half-convinced, but I'm pretty stubborn - if only there was a way to get users accurately distinguish between interest/quality. You said there where complicated approaches that do work, got any examples? | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 14:29 | history | answered | Rumi P. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |