Timeline for Is UX design subject to disruptive innovations?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2013 at 16:51 | comment | added | SuperFluxx | It is not only because something is learnt that it is necessarily disruptive. There is a difference between evolution and disruption. The former is slow, the later is much quicker, much rarer. User Behaviour seems closer to evolution than disruption to me. | |
| Jul 17, 2013 at 14:50 | comment | added | user28446 | The idea that it is learned seems to support disruptive tech... It applies that something might be more natural, and would be better if we were just as familiar with it (see comment on Neils answer) | |
| Jul 16, 2013 at 21:34 | history | edited | SuperFluxx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 16, 2013 at 19:45 | history | answered | SuperFluxx | CC BY-SA 3.0 |