Skip to main content
added 8 characters in body
Source Link
rk.
  • 17.9k
  • 1
  • 58
  • 88

Scientific notation would have you display this as: 1.23e5Scientific notation would have you display this as: 1.23e5, it's more 'correct' when it comes to units: 1.23e5 m is right, whereas 123k m isn't (it should be 123 km).

However if your users aren't comfortable with the 'k' postfix then I doubt they'd like this much, I merely mention it for completeness.

Other possibilities might be to have something like: 123thou or 123,000123thou or 123,000

Scientific notation would have you display this as: 1.23e5, it's more 'correct' when it comes to units: 1.23e5 m is right, whereas 123k m isn't (it should be 123 km).

However if your users aren't comfortable with the 'k' postfix then I doubt they'd like this much, I merely mention it for completeness.

Other possibilities might be to have something like: 123thou or 123,000

Scientific notation would have you display this as: 1.23e5, it's more 'correct' when it comes to units: 1.23e5 m is right, whereas 123k m isn't (it should be 123 km).

However if your users aren't comfortable with the 'k' postfix then I doubt they'd like this much, I merely mention it for completeness.

Other possibilities might be to have something like: 123thou or 123,000

Source Link

Scientific notation would have you display this as: 1.23e5, it's more 'correct' when it comes to units: 1.23e5 m is right, whereas 123k m isn't (it should be 123 km).

However if your users aren't comfortable with the 'k' postfix then I doubt they'd like this much, I merely mention it for completeness.

Other possibilities might be to have something like: 123thou or 123,000