Timeline for What explains the current shift from glossy UIs to matte UIs?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 25, 2013 at 22:13 | comment | added | ocodo | I'm telling you why the trend is prevalent, I'm not able to tell you to like it. | |
Mar 25, 2013 at 11:19 | comment | added | Relaxing In Cyprus | Well, a lot of web sites are also all about BANG! and grabbing the customer. Those flat designs in that showcase site all strike me as fairly uniform and dull; generic bootstrap clones. | |
Mar 24, 2013 at 0:22 | comment | added | ocodo | @FacebookAnswers - by the way, billboards have never been a good example of typography, they've always been much more about BANG! and strong photographic imagery, so for them to have a lot of "realistic" effects is simply the nature of what they are. | |
Mar 24, 2013 at 0:17 | comment | added | ocodo | @FacebookAnswers I've updated my answer to change "commercial print" to "high-end print" - Note: fltdsgn.com showcases a lot of so called "flat design" and it all looks like high end print of the last 25 years. (see Neville Brody, or Meta design) | |
Mar 24, 2013 at 0:11 | history | edited | ocodo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
Mar 24, 2013 at 0:08 | history | undeleted | ocodo | ||
Mar 2, 2013 at 10:29 | history | deleted | ocodo | ||
Mar 2, 2013 at 10:27 | comment | added | Relaxing In Cyprus | This simply isn't true. A drive down any city street will show countless posters and the like with web-like imagery. You even get the peeling poster effect, which is a bit ironic. | |
Mar 2, 2013 at 3:41 | history | answered | ocodo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |