Skip to main content
added 13 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
Source Link
icc97
  • 7.2k
  • 24
  • 33

I'm assuming (see next paragraph if my assumption is wrong) that it's a 1-1 relationship between master and detail ie you don't really have a trillion detail rows. In which case you seem to have exactly the same case as with Google search. They for one do not allow you to search for a blank string, but beyond that it seems like you just need to copy what they do with displaying the page detail to the right when you click on one of the rows, plus the pagination as you planned.

If you do have that many detail rows, then either think of the concept of drilling down from an excel pivot table where double clicking on a master row brings up all the detail rows. Or follow the Google path of 'search within these results' so you have a link below the master row that would bring up the paginated detail results rather than double click.:

  1. think of the concept of drilling down from an excel pivot table where double clicking on a master row brings up all the detail rows.
  2. follow the Google path of 'search within these results' so you have a link below the master row that would bring up the paginated detail results rather than double click.

I'm assuming (see next paragraph if my assumption is wrong) that it's a 1-1 relationship between master and detail ie you don't really have a trillion detail rows. In which case you seem to have exactly the same case as with Google search. They for one do not allow you to search for a blank string, but beyond that it seems like you just need to copy what they do with displaying the page detail to the right when you click on one of the rows, plus the pagination as you planned.

If you do have that many detail rows, then either think of the concept of drilling down from an excel pivot table where double clicking on a master row brings up all the detail rows. Or follow the Google path of 'search within these results' so you have a link below the master row that would bring up the paginated detail results rather than double click.

I'm assuming (see next paragraph if my assumption is wrong) that it's a 1-1 relationship between master and detail ie you don't really have a trillion detail rows. In which case you seem to have exactly the same case as with Google search. They for one do not allow you to search for a blank string, but beyond that it seems like you just need to copy what they do with displaying the page detail to the right when you click on one of the rows, plus the pagination as you planned.

If you do have that many detail rows, then either:

  1. think of the concept of drilling down from an excel pivot table where double clicking on a master row brings up all the detail rows.
  2. follow the Google path of 'search within these results' so you have a link below the master row that would bring up the paginated detail results rather than double click.
added 361 characters in body; added 47 characters in body
Source Link
icc97
  • 7.2k
  • 24
  • 33

I'm assuming (see next paragraph if my assumption is wrong) that it's a 1-1 relationship between master and detail ie you don't really have a trillion detail rows. In which case you seem to have exactly the same case as with Google search. They for one do not allow you to search for a blank string, but beyond that it seems like you just need to copy what they do with displaying the page detail to the right when you click on one of the rows, plus the pagination as you planned.

If you do have that many detail rows, then either think of the concept of drilling down from an excel pivot table where double clicking on a master row brings up all the detail rows. Or follow the Google path of 'search within these results' so you have a link below the master row that would bring up the paginated detail results rather than double click.

I'm assuming that it's a 1-1 relationship between master and detail ie you don't really have a trillion detail rows. In which case you seem to have exactly the same case as with Google search. They for one do not allow you to search for a blank string, but beyond that it seems like you just need to copy what they do with displaying the page detail to the right when you click on one of the rows, plus the pagination as you planned.

I'm assuming (see next paragraph if my assumption is wrong) that it's a 1-1 relationship between master and detail ie you don't really have a trillion detail rows. In which case you seem to have exactly the same case as with Google search. They for one do not allow you to search for a blank string, but beyond that it seems like you just need to copy what they do with displaying the page detail to the right when you click on one of the rows, plus the pagination as you planned.

If you do have that many detail rows, then either think of the concept of drilling down from an excel pivot table where double clicking on a master row brings up all the detail rows. Or follow the Google path of 'search within these results' so you have a link below the master row that would bring up the paginated detail results rather than double click.

Source Link
icc97
  • 7.2k
  • 24
  • 33

I'm assuming that it's a 1-1 relationship between master and detail ie you don't really have a trillion detail rows. In which case you seem to have exactly the same case as with Google search. They for one do not allow you to search for a blank string, but beyond that it seems like you just need to copy what they do with displaying the page detail to the right when you click on one of the rows, plus the pagination as you planned.