Timeline for Where should I put "Check for updates" functionality?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2012 at 16:02 | vote | accept | André | ||
| Aug 10, 2012 at 10:41 | answer | added | Marjan Venema | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 10, 2012 at 5:04 | answer | added | Spam Hater | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 23:14 | comment | added | Zelda | is there a reason to update manually? Sometimes there is | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 22:00 | answer | added | Aadaam | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 21:38 | answer | added | vamsi | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 11:25 | comment | added | Bartosz Rakowski | I would promote Aadaam comment to an answer. | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 11:15 | history | edited | kastark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarified question
|
| Aug 9, 2012 at 10:57 | comment | added | Aadaam | Check for updates automatically, I mean, why would it need user control? I'd be curious how many people actually click on the Check for Updates menu versus the number of people who update after they get a notificaion. However, beware that industrial users might not want to update / want to know what is in the update. After all, a medical device, even if just diagnostical, is a matter of life and death... a wrong diagnosis because of an outdated firmware or a new buggy one is more responsibility than "adium crashed, let's update".. | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 10:26 | history | asked | André | CC BY-SA 3.0 |