Timeline for Is a usability study on just a newsletter effective?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2012 at 4:04 | answer | added | Riche Design | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 24, 2012 at 7:43 | answer | added | André | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 22, 2012 at 14:19 | answer | added | Valeria Spirovski | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 22, 2012 at 13:32 | comment | added | Valeria Spirovski | I agree with the qualitative study bit, but how else would you conduct a qualitative study other than setting tasks for users to complete? | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 16:36 | answer | added | Mervin | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 16:27 | comment | added | PhillipW | Agreed Ben. With this kind of thing I'd also worry that the presence of the experimenter will distort the study in that they are more likely to read it (rather than just skim it or ignore it) if they are being 'tested'. | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 13:00 | answer | added | Florent Paillot | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 8:59 | answer | added | Dan Barak | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 21, 2012 at 7:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/226581055346450432 | ||
| Jul 20, 2012 at 15:57 | comment | added | Zelda | Personally I'd focus on qualitative study here rather than a typical "do these tasks and we'll see where you screw up" style study. | |
| Jul 20, 2012 at 14:51 | history | edited | Benoit Meunier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| S Jul 20, 2012 at 14:46 | history | suggested | mawcsco | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
rephrased title to aid comprehension and scanability
|
| Jul 20, 2012 at 14:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 20, 2012 at 14:46 | |||||
| Jul 20, 2012 at 14:11 | history | asked | Benoit Meunier | CC BY-SA 3.0 |