Timeline for Is there a UX term for a "happy state"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2019 at 20:50 | comment | added | Michael Lai♦ | I wouldn't say that a 'happy' state is like an 'empty' state because an empty state can be when there is no content to show at the start of an interaction sequence or even at the end of an interaction sequence when there is no result to show. Whereas your happy state is usually only when a user has completed a specific sequence of actions. | |
| Oct 12, 2018 at 10:38 | history | edited | RobbyReindeer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 144 characters in body
|
| Sep 26, 2018 at 9:41 | comment | added | Caius Jard | I wasnt so much thinking of it having to be about console games; more that computer games (and i used console where really i could have said computer, wasnt thinking speciifically console either)) have an end sequence, and people would fairly reliably understand what par tof the process was being discussed if you said "hey, have you seen the end sequence to mario kart x? it's fantastic" -- ultimately, i presumed you were looking for a way to internally refer to this page that is at the end of the process, so maybe your coworkers would know what you meant if you called it the "endgame" page ? | |
| Sep 26, 2018 at 6:16 | comment | added | RobbyReindeer | @CaiusJard this question doesn't really have to do with console games (maybe my fault for not making it clear) and I'd imagine that being a separate question in itself. | |
| Sep 24, 2018 at 12:23 | comment | added | Caius Jard |
In console game terms, this would be the end sequence? Possibly this morphed into endgame ?
|
|
| Sep 24, 2018 at 8:34 | comment | added | RobbyReindeer | @Pac0 it would probably be better with another hand going in for the high five but it was just an example. | |
| Sep 23, 2018 at 9:17 | comment | added | Pac0 | makes me think about "fist bump" ad for Stack Overflow teams. This hand tells me "STOP, you can't go any further", not the intended high five invitation. | |
| S Sep 21, 2018 at 12:47 | history | suggested | Pikamander2 |
Add terminology tag
|
|
| Sep 21, 2018 at 9:36 | answer | added | Nicolas Raoul | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 21, 2018 at 8:45 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 21, 2018 at 12:47 | |||||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 20:42 | answer | added | Michael Lai♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 19:09 | vote | accept | RobbyReindeer | ||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 18:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackUX/status/1042836623220723713 | ||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 14:10 | answer | added | xul | timeline score: 69 | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 13:51 | answer | added | Pectoralis Major | timeline score: 8 | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 13:30 | comment | added | dennislees | Can you possibly tighten this question up a bit? Are you asking about a way to describe a screen? or the potential mental state of a user looking at this screen. It's a little confusing to talk about screens being in a "happy state", and if it's the user's mental state you're talking about, then using emotions as a reference is likely to be inaccurate, because it's quite possible for one user to reach the end of process and be pleased, but another to reach the end of the same process and feel completely indifferent about it. | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 13:16 | answer | added | dennislees | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 13:02 | history | asked | RobbyReindeer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |