Timeline for Door handle on automatic doors - why?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 24, 2018 at 16:25 | comment | added | David Richerby | It seems unlikely that they'd be able to add a motor to an existing non-motorized door, rather than needing to replace the whole thing. | |
Jan 23, 2018 at 21:32 | comment | added | Mast | In this case it doesn't fly. I know those doors and the trains they're on. The door has always been automatic. Train-toilets with non-automated doors look quite different and if the toilet is upgraded it happens during the complete rebuild. In which case the original doors don't survive. | |
Jan 22, 2018 at 18:13 | comment | added | Peter Green | Also that handle is about the simplest handle you can fit, just a bit of curved metal bolted to that door. A recessed handle would require the door to be designed around it. | |
Jan 22, 2018 at 15:30 | history | edited | Alan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Jan 22, 2018 at 15:29 | review | First posts | |||
Jan 22, 2018 at 15:30 | |||||
Jan 22, 2018 at 15:28 | history | answered | Anand Sriraman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |