Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 13, 2020 at 18:25 comment added Robbie Goodwin At least your client cares! I suggest forcing the User to scroll anything less than 100% before 'Accepting' isn't a useful compromise. That's beyond merely patronising; it's plainly dishonest. Vulnerable, handicapped or "ordinary", no User should be "led" into agreeing anything without reading it, Cookie Bear… google.com/search?q=cookie+bear&rlz=1C5CHFA_enGB779GB779&oq=cookie+bear&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j0l7.2767j0j9&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 There should be no excuse for a site allowing Users to agree to anything without reading it. If that means first printing it out, so be it.
Feb 20, 2018 at 17:11 answer added LNubiola timeline score: 0
Feb 20, 2018 at 17:06 answer added colmcq timeline score: 0
Feb 20, 2018 at 16:52 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jan 21, 2018 at 15:52 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Dec 22, 2017 at 20:58 history tweeted twitter.com/StackUX/status/944311180931358721
Dec 22, 2017 at 15:49 answer added Izquierdo timeline score: 3
Dec 22, 2017 at 14:51 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Nov 22, 2017 at 13:52 answer added Kitanga Nday timeline score: 0
Nov 22, 2017 at 13:49 comment added Kitanga Nday @DasBeasto And that's why no one sues.
Nov 21, 2017 at 17:46 comment added DasBeasto Very interesting question, on one hand you should allow screen readers to skip large bodies of text, on the other if you let them skip it then you are acknowledging that the "I have read and agree to the terms..." is a lie.
Nov 21, 2017 at 17:43 review First posts
Nov 21, 2017 at 23:32
Nov 21, 2017 at 17:41 history asked Kimberly Grey CC BY-SA 3.0