Timeline for "Can you make it more prominent?" stakeholder phenomenon
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 22, 2017 at 3:38 | vote | accept | Blue Ocean | ||
S Jun 21, 2017 at 3:04 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Jun 21, 2017 at 3:04 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Jun 15, 2017 at 9:52 | answer | added | Alexandru Panaite | timeline score: 0 | |
Jun 13, 2017 at 8:23 | answer | added | Michael Lai♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
S Jun 13, 2017 at 1:42 | history | bounty started | Blue Ocean | ||
S Jun 13, 2017 at 1:42 | history | notice added | Blue Ocean | Authoritative reference needed | |
Jun 10, 2017 at 16:15 | comment | added | PhillipW | There should be some kind of company ownership structure of the product. If nobody really is in charge (which is what this sounds like) its very difficult not to get tied up with the conflicting demands of stakeholders. | |
Jun 10, 2017 at 6:25 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackUX/status/873425984908865537 | ||
Jun 9, 2017 at 17:26 | answer | added | plainclothes | timeline score: 6 | |
Jun 9, 2017 at 14:06 | answer | added | jhurley | timeline score: 4 | |
Jun 9, 2017 at 13:59 | answer | added | JanErikGunnar | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 8, 2017 at 3:17 | answer | added | Luke Smith | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 14:55 | comment | added | Nick Groeneveld | If you present your point based on clear arguments/research and the stakeholders still do not agree with you, there's nothing you can do. You can't beat that kind of stubbornness. | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 9:16 | history | edited | Blue Ocean | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 45 characters in body
|
Jun 6, 2017 at 9:13 | answer | added | Joao Carvalho | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 6, 2017 at 8:58 | history | edited | Blue Ocean | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Jun 6, 2017 at 8:44 | history | asked | Blue Ocean | CC BY-SA 3.0 |