Timeline for Reliability of Remote UX Tests (Screen cast, A/B)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://ux.stackexchange.com/ with https://ux.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jan 5, 2017 at 11:04 | vote | accept | Ash Hogarth | ||
Dec 18, 2016 at 14:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Nov 18, 2016 at 18:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackUX/status/799677423428059136 | ||
Nov 18, 2016 at 13:09 | answer | added | Kristiyan Lukanov | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 18, 2016 at 11:57 | comment | added | JonW♦ | Any lab-based testing is going to introduce biases. This includes remote, screenrecording systems. But true A/B testing with variants on the live site and monitoring analytics gets you more accurate results. | |
Nov 18, 2016 at 11:55 | review | First posts | |||
Nov 18, 2016 at 14:40 | |||||
Nov 18, 2016 at 11:52 | history | asked | Ash Hogarth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |