Timeline for How to emphasize/mark one option over the other?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2016 at 19:47 | vote | accept | Roi Mulia | ||
| Oct 16, 2016 at 18:35 | comment | added | Roi Mulia | Than we'll have the same context | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 18:35 | comment | added | Roi Mulia | Would you like to check it? :) Video to Photo - Extract Single Frames in Full HD by Roi Mulia appsto.re/il/Np-teb.i | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 18:29 | comment | added | Alan | Yes, I am answering your question without full context/understanding of the design. If you believe an iAP page would be a better outlet for displaying the cost, then trust your judgement. You know the app better than I do. :) | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 18:25 | comment | added | Roi Mulia | Than after he clicks, i explain to him how can he open this option(and getting him "do" the second action we wanted, which is the iAP option). After explaining this two, do you still convince showing the data up-front, might be a better way? without A/B for the matter(i know it's needed, but i need to choose an option) | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 18:25 | comment | added | Roi Mulia | Good example. The one answer i can think of regarding to your question. In my perspective, we are mixing two different stuff. Think about that that way. We have two separate actions we are trying to "pass" to the user. First one, that the Full HD(etc) option is the more exclusive/better one. Secondly, we want him to buy the one-time In App Purchase. The main reason why iv'e created two screens. Is that in the first one, i'm trying only to make them realize the second options(paid) is better. Without providing external info(as for, what would you choose, Mercedes or Peugeot). | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 18:18 | history | edited | Alan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 114 characters in body
|
| Oct 16, 2016 at 18:17 | comment | added | Alan | Without proper A/B testing, it's always challenging determining which method of presentation is the best. I'm a firm believer in as little steps as possible, but you also bring up a good point of intimidating the user with a price. Either way, the user will have to "take action" to get full HD, so why not be up front with pricing? I've attached another screenshot to my answer. | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 18:10 | comment | added | Roi Mulia | Hey Alan, again thank you for your response! The one thing which i'm banging my head over and over is the act of "separation". Meaning, that i do aware of the art of "minimal clicks possible". Tho, wouldn't it be too much info provided, that could be interpreted as a "pressure" from the app, to take action? I mean. I understand that avoid this extra screen is basically a good thing, tho, would it more "inviting" to separate it? I mean, the users might avoid this act only by seeing the $ tag below it, I might be wrong. Would love to hear your response. That's my last question. :) | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 17:06 | history | edited | Alan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
To answer comment
|
| Oct 16, 2016 at 17:02 | comment | added | Alan | See post edit for answer | |
| Oct 16, 2016 at 11:34 | comment | added | Roi Mulia | Hey Alan! Thank you for your response! :) about the small lock addon, how would you "explain" to the user that this option is unlocked, if he would be removed? I mean, i've attached the lock only to some how hint the user that this options is currently not available to him. What would you advise? Plus, i can't seem to think on a way, that it'll explain the user all the pros of this option(listed below the button) + explain to him that this options is locked. Would love to hear your response! :) | |
| Oct 15, 2016 at 19:11 | history | answered | Alan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |