New answers tagged

0

I suggest not going the one-at-a-time route for these reasons: Without an indication of how long a task will take, many users will simply abort the task altogether. If the user does not immediately know how many questions there will be they may not even begin, or quit after answering an arbitrary number of questions which they deem "too many". If you show ...


2

Maybe you could ask them for a zip code or city or something like that?


1

I'd say its good to be up-front with users and actually talk about location. Context Most "mapping" apps are owned by the device maker eg Apple Maps, Google Maps and you give them access in the device TOS. So in those cases they don't ask for permissions. However, newly installed 3rd party apps on current versions of iOS (13) & Android (10) are ...


1

Having it in a list view just as you have it is intuitive. However, I would suggest that you add a border around the 'protocol' just like you have it on the 'remove' button. The remove button can now be replaced with an icon just beside the protocols. That way, you can save more space for longer protocol titles and have the protocols easily identifiable.


0

Here we have 4 steps for users: Filling sign up form Tell user a verification link sent to entered email address Clicking on verification link to confirm email address & tell user email confirmed or not Ask user to login with entered username & password or redirect user from confirmation page alert to login page automatically In first step you have ...


0

Welcome to ux.stackexchange @Rajesh! An equally important part of the interaction design process is lending out an ear to the customer or client requirements and interpreting them correctly. Their persistence to continue the carousel based approach could hint at the requirement of making the events/programs visible from the word go, rather than pushing them ...


0

all of the above links as well as https://pttrns.com/ & https://uimovement.com/ to present Interaction mock.


Top 50 recent answers are included