5

I've seen both versions used in Android. What do you think is the best term to use? I've also heard people to use "Long click", "Long touch" & "Long tap" but I personally don't like any of those. It would be nice to finally get some standard for this terminology.

  • For my opinion "Touch & hold", because it explains user action in details. – Vaso Beruashvili Aug 24 '16 at 10:44
  • 1
    I don't have any evidence or data to back me up so I'm going to add it as a comment, I'd say "Touch and hold" or "Press and hold" describes the action which is required to complete the task more precisely, so I'd go with that. – MJB Aug 24 '16 at 11:17
4

Well, if this is for Android, chances are you're using Material, and according to Material Design guidelines, the proper term is long press

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
4

I would suggest "Touch and hold". Many users tend not to understand the term "long" in longpress. Therefore "Press and [then] hold" is a better description of the action.


Edit

OK, due to the comments below, here is a more descriptive answer :-)

"Longpress" means "press for a long time".The word "long" comes first but that is the second action the user has to commit. We also have to tell the user how much time (s)he shall spend during that "long" time.

The word "longpress" is not (yet) a term that common people understand.

So, every term beginning with the word "long..." aught to be avoided.

"Press and hold" on the other hand tells the user to 1: press on the item and then 2: keep on doing so until something else happens, something that will inform the user (s)he can release his/her finger from the device.

| improve this answer | |
  • Can you add references to back this up? There are many assumptions in the answer that have my doubt. Long is an adjective that announces how to press, I don't understand why people won't read it that way. "Touch and hold" can be interpreted as separate instructions, where "touch" suggests to touch and release before the "hold" instruction comes into the short term memory. I don't say this is true, but there might be more to it than what you put forward. – jazZRo Jul 2 at 8:33
-2

First of all 5 characters are fairy easy to brute force and one can copy all your lists very easily and do whatever they want with them.

A better solution would be:

  1. No signup of course, user goes straight to their URL and you attach a cookie to their browser to identify them without requiring pin for them(explained below).
  2. On the list page display a banner that says "Set a pin and make your to do list private. Even if you share them with others they will have to put the pin you set".
  3. If they think their information needs protection they will set a pin and URL along with the pin will act like a username-password combo which is less likely to be hacked.
  4. The pin can even be 4 numbers (easy to remember) and you can restrict the brute forcing of pin in your backend.
| improve this answer | |
  • You've accidentally posted this answer twice; it doesn't fit here, so it's better to delete this one. – Glorfindel Jul 5 at 12:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.