11

When working with a UI that relies more on text than on icons it's common to find + to mean Add, - to mean Delete/Remove and X for Close (or also Delete/Remove). But is there a common character meaning Edit?

If using icons, a pencil seems to be the generally accepted symbol, but we're trying to minimize icon use.

  • 4
    For close, don't use a letter x. Use a times symbol × (× as an escaped entity). It looks better. – Bennett McElwee Oct 10 '11 at 23:07
  • This is an implementation problem NOT a UX problem. – Stewart Dean Jun 19 '13 at 15:19
19

Not really.

As Tommy says, * often means it has been changed.

r and w are common technical characters in context of being readable and writable.

> can be used in context of a menu, or moving forward, or perhaps to 'move on' to an action but that action could be anything , so it's meaning would really not be clear other than by experimentation. In which case you might as well use e.

But - dare I say it, edit is itself not a long word...and commonly used where icons are not. eg here on SE, Wikipedia, and a brazilian other places.

  • 3
    I like the idea of just using edit. Dont be afraid of good old fashion, but clear, words. – jonshariat Jul 6 '11 at 20:41
  • 3
    Not so short in other languages, such as bearbeiten in German. – Basil Bourque Sep 30 '14 at 6:52
  • If you're German and you don't understand "edit" to be short for "editieren" you do not deserve to be taken into consideration when designing a user interface. – HumanCatfood Jul 12 '18 at 14:23
15

There are some Unicode characters you could use. "Lower Right Pencil" (✎ in HTML) or "Writing Hand" (✍). They look like this:

✎ ✍

You could try using different Unicode fonts or font sizes to make them look nicer.

3

I don't think there's a standard character for it. Maybe you could use an asterisk. It's already kind of used in this context: when you open a document in a lot of Windows applications, they put an asterisk after the file name, if it has unsaved changes.

3

In order to indicate further detail (normally allowing edition), ellipsis ... is used.

So I think it could work if edition is not in-place (a new window/callout tooltip is used for editing), and the ellipsis button opens the editable detail view.

Note that, although it is not a single character in ASCII, it is an Unicode character (U+2026) and an HTML entity (…).

0

This is a bit dated but here it goes.

EDIT is sort of a broad use item that has different application

  • ie a graphic (cut and paste)
  • a list (insert, change, and move)
  • some text data (find replace, spell check, font properties)

That's just to name a few. My experience comes a little bit from hardware as in the audio recording/editing industry where buttons have symbols

  • play ascii(62) '>'
  • stop ascii(254) '■'
  • Rec ascii(250) '·' but in a much larger size
  • edit ascii(94) '^'

but if your developing for windows and you just want to use single characters you might experiment with Symbol and wingding fonts

good luck

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.