7

Some people can type without needing to look at the keys. Other people need to look at the keys before pressing a key.

I'm curious if there is any published research on the percentage of users that need to hunt for the keys vs. the percentage that can type without looking at the keyboard.

I was able to find several studies comparing speeds - as expected, the people who typed without looking won - but could not find any on population percentages that use each method.

  • I have no idea how they'd even come up with that statistic. – DA01 Oct 21 '14 at 22:14
  • 1
    You ask a large enough group of people whether they look at a keyboard when they type or whether they can type without looking. – Kevin Burke Oct 22 '14 at 1:33
  • Well, that's actually not a bad idea. Maybe add it is a survey to your site? – DA01 Oct 22 '14 at 2:54
  • 1
    Can you add a listener (a very basic keylogger) to an actual text input field on your site that generates statistics for (word) typing speed etc.? When correlated with the speed tests you already know, you will know about the percentage among your users. – Crissov Oct 22 '14 at 10:27
  • Good idea with the keylogger - although I imagine some users might be uncomfortable if they knew. The larger question seems like one rather impossible to answer well, for one because the demographic in question is so broad. – Jessica Yang Nov 17 '14 at 22:24
2

From my involved search, there is no academic research on the exact prevalence of hunt and peck versus touch typists. The closest thing I could find is information in a typing dynamics article from Carnegie Mellon, "A Scientific Understanding of Keystroke Dynamics." Page 106 describes the typing style scale they used and that they had more touch-typists than not, but the sample is only 100 and it likely includes many students, so I wouldN'T call it representative.

1

In Aguascalientes, Mexico, I worked in a telemarketing company with almost 2,000 employees, I was able to help the quality department in the agent notes section and checked side-by-side performance of ~1,000 employees, of which only 6 were able to type faster than 60 wpm, they were of course touch-typists, if you include me in the sample, that'd mean 0.7%

I think this widely varies by region, I wouldn't be disapointed if the U.S. got higher rates

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.