Weighing up the pro's and con's, should a company invest the time, money and staff in adapting an existing site to be responsive (definition below)?

I'm after a solid argument for (or against) committing resources to achieve this task. Do the negatives of NOT making it responsive outweigh the time and effort of doing it?

(definition from wiki below :P)

Responsive web design: - aimed at crafting sites to provide an optimal viewing experience—easy reading and navigation with a minimum of resizing, panning, and scrolling—across a wide range of devices (from mobile phones to desktop computer monitors).

  • Well if you think the site should be responsive, why do you think that? If you have a good reason for thinking it's a good thing then that's what you tell the stakeholders. If you don't have a good reason for thinking it's a good idea then why is it you want to do it?
    – JonW
    Jun 7, 2014 at 17:58
  • 2 main reasons: With my knowledge of how easy it can be achieved its a bit embarrassing that they're not, plus the fact that mobile web browsing equals or is greater than desktop browsing (?). What I'm after is an answer that is more coherent, based on research and /or stats and more detailed and with more pro's/con's than what I just said.
    – Dave Haigh
    Jun 7, 2014 at 18:06
  • @JonW also i'm aware that this question might be a bit leading. if it can be improved please let me know
    – Dave Haigh
    Jun 7, 2014 at 18:18

2 Answers 2


Even if it's an obvious answer to this question, it is still important. Apart from the target audience answer to this question, which is also an answer, I'd go with the more future safe one.

The website don't have to be responsive in every aspect. A mobile friendly website is very important though. You need to make sure mobile users have a good experience if you want them to be positive about your site. It's best explained in an image which is 21 months old:

enter image description here

Imagine the figures today and tomorrow and there's your answer to every reluctant IT or Marketing manager.

Websites that aren’t mobile-friendly annoy users and that’s bad business. Consumers are doing more on mobile devices, including shopping and product research; when they do, users look for content to meet their on-the-go needs.

A recent Google survey of mobile users found that 72 percent of mobile users say it’s important to them that websites are mobile-friendly, yet 96 percent have visited a site that doesn’t work well on their device.

Almost three-quarters of respondents said they are more likely to revisit a mobile-friendly site. Users are five times more likely to abandon the task they are trying to complete if the site isn’t optimized for mobile use, with 79 percent saying they will go back to search and try to find another site to meet their needs.

Reference: 72% of Consumers Want Mobile-Friendly Sites: Google Research


This is more like a project management question than a ux one. Every decent company has stats regarding their traffic.

It's clear that users coming from mobile devices would benefit from a responsive design because the site would be more readable and accessible for their small screens. Simply not having to zoom in and move around the page is a big plus, and I don't think you need to show any statistical data for it, it's common sense.

If they have a huge amount of traffic coming from mobile, or from devices that have a width that is less than the size of the site in it's current form, then they are losing big time because their site is not responsive. However, if the traffic is mostly desktop, then the return on investment for implementing responsive design is low.

Another thing to consider is the design workflow that is already set up and how the designers are working in/for that company right now. They might not be used to the responsive requirements, they might not have a proper understanding of how to do the design, or the product owner/whoever makes the requirements doesn't know how to ask for responsiveness.

  • One problem with stats: if your site is not mobile friendly, the number of mobile users will drop (or has dropped) over time, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy when using those numbers to decide whether or not to make the site mobile friendly. Jun 9, 2014 at 11:23
  • Agreed. But still, if product wants mobile they have to specifically ask for it. After they ask for it, UX needs to take it into account, then design, and in the end implementation. I still think it's a high level decision that has to be made regarding this. Jun 10, 2014 at 12:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.