0

What interaction designers do is to create user interface elements and map UI elements to functionalities under the hood, at the same time paying attention to appropriate metaphor and constraints like grouping and mapping etc.

I think it's possible to develop a tool to help interaction designers to do this work. For example, enumerate all possible design based on the constraints given by the designer, e.g. the total number of UI elements, or ON and OFF should be afforded on a single switch.

How do you think? Is there already such tool? Thanks!

closed as unclear what you're asking by DA01, Benny Skogberg, Jimmy Breck-McKye, user34398, Matt Obee May 19 '14 at 8:42

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    This is a little vague. Can you clarify what end result you are looking for is? – DA01 May 17 '14 at 20:12
4

There are too many variables thrown into each design for an automated solution to be of any practical usage. Also, except for the most minimalistic designs, the amount of options - and thus the amount of comparisons needed - will quickly become unmanageable to review (as maths has it).

What's more, many design decisions are made based on experience, knowledge (say, of cognition), familiarity with the specifics of the problem and the target users. It is impossible to replace all of these by an algorithm. Just consider the elements on the black stripe at the top of this page. There has been some thinking behind how these are organised, aligned, spaced, the colours, whether or not to include text or icons, arrows, borders, placeholders, etc.

There are, however, many aids that can help reach decisions and being manual they leave the control in the hand of the designer, who by the very virtue of attempts (conceptual designs) learns what works and what doesn't - the latter dramatically reduces the number of options.

One example for this is task models, where you create associations between content and actions and then simply have to segment the whole thing into containers, whether pages, panels, menus, etc. You can then use analytics data to further determine the size and position of various elements.

Network analysis is another tool that is largely ignored at the moment with relation to interface design, although I'm convinced that in years to come it will gain dramatic popularity. Although it would not output the actual design, it can provide highly valuable data on its performance. If anything is to become semi-automatic in the future, my bet would be on this square; but to get good results from network analysis you have to feed in good data - and there's plenty of it when it comes to UI design.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.