1

The actual question can be 'Is there any?'

Standard software development process have many standard; mutually agreed and proven estimation techniques. Few of them I have listed below:

  1. Use Case Point
  2. Story Point
  3. Functional Point
  4. Complexity Point
  5. Regression Model

Do these estimation techniques include efforts for UX/UI also? If not, in what way we can make use of these techniques to estimate project from UX point of view? Appreciate information, reports, references, case studies on these points.

| improve this question | |
  • What are you interesting in estimated? I'm not familiar with the terminology of estimating a 'project' -- do you mean to regress potential profit or are you looking to construct a estimate of "usability score"? – Brendon Jan 31 '14 at 8:01
  • Here, I am referring to total efforts required to complete given UX project (even if its a freelance work). I am not expecting resourcing (How many designers will work parallely to complete the project within clients expected time) and even not looking for profit (which comes in later part and differs from company to company and person to person depending on their strategy to grow further). So in simple words, if I am a small team of freelance UX designers, and if my client provides me requirements, how can I estimate, how much time I will require to give them UX solution (Design)? – Spicerjet Jan 31 '14 at 8:56
1

I can speak about my experience working in an enterprise environment where my team works on projects for various business units, each having wildly different expectation about our engagement. Aside from the scope of the project, our estimates can differ depending on:

  • At what stage of the project you're brought in
  • What deliverables you're expected to produce
  • How much you will be involved during iterative development process
  • Number of obligatory meetings you're expected to attend

Looking at 100+ different sized projects we've worked on over the years, we've learned that amount of time spent on UX tracked nicely in proportion to development hours (excluding time spent by analysts, project management, and other overhead), and that ratio has been 1:10.

For example, if an IT project is budgeted for $3 million and $2 million of that is for development hours, $200,000 is roughly how much we end up charging back based on our retroactive analysis.

However, this isn't how we actually estimate level of effort, because saying "10% of development hours" isn't going to fly with most PMs and project sponsors. So we usually use combination of sizing techniques.

In all projects, there is a lot of pre-work and meetings. So we estimate how many hours per week we expect to spend attending meetings and doing analysis based on their project schedule. If it will take 2 people on my team 50% of their time for next 3 weeks, then it will be 2x40x0.5x3 = 120 hours.

As we progress into the project and requirement becomes more baked, we are able to factor in things like unique screen counts, flows, fidelity of prototypes, complexity of interactions and information, latest stakeholder expectations, and etc. to arrive at more accurate level of effort.

It's best to not reveal the detailed breakdown of you arrived at the numbers. Chances are, if you've been doing this for awhile, the 'overall' number will average out to be accurate, but the breakdowns may not be, and some may question them.

| improve this answer | |
0

Depends on your outputs and the size of the system analysed.

It comes with years of experience to estimate properly and is generally heuristically evaluated. I know how long it takes me to produce X wireframes and interview Y users.

There really is no set formula as projects are so variable

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.