User Experience Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for user experience researchers and experts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I'm looking to protect an innovative user interface design idea for a mobile application. It took a lot of work and creative effort to come up with a design that satisfies the particular constraints I'm working under, and I would like to protect the design from copy-cat attempts.
Since the design will be used globally, this is a generic question, but the most important markets are the US and EU, so I would prefer details that apply specifically there.
In the EU and Germany you can protect your design. There is no rule for all, but several national laws.
As far as I understood the process, you are going to protect your design following this guide. There will be no examination for the uniqueness of your design nor a protection for duplicates in terms of secureness. If a possible duplicate exist, you have to prove your uniqueness at the court.
For an idea what this means, I give you an example of German law, which is the biggest economy in Europe btw.
In Germany you can protect design, if...
A design must be new [...] This means that no design that is identical or differing only in immaterial details from the design applied for has been published[...]
Furthermore, the design must have individual character [...in the eye of...] the so-called "informed user" [...]
[But] novelety and individual character are not examined by the German Patent [...] [It] will be examined by the civil courts when there is a dispute [...]
Source German Patent and Trademark Office - Design | Page 6
But there is a common workaround for the gaps, that exist if you protect a design: Usually you go for a patent, if you want to secure your software, not design only!
Discoveries, mathematical methods, computer programs and business methods as such are not regarded as inventions.
Source: European Patent Office.
But a patent has to offer a unique solution to a technical problem. Which isn't done by a software only. So you fill a patent for the whole computer system as well as your software running on it. You secure the computer AND the software as a complete system. Thus you have proven your technical and material side of your invention and its patentable.
And going this way, you can protect it easily EU-wide. Nevertheless, you definitely need a lawyer for the whole process.
Sidenote: As far as I know, a behaviour like Apple's elastic drawback at end of lists can't be protected in the EU. May be they did it nevertheless.
Edit: Just read a (german) article about the issue, that you can't easily fill a patent for software in Europe. It mentioned, that even Konrad Zuse recalled his patent claim, because it needed to much time and it wasn't sure he obtains a patent on his invention - the first computer Zuse Z3. Probably the first patent claim in computer history (german only, but worth a quick look).
Important: This isn't a legal advice as I'm not a lawyer or in this matter somehow. It's my personal opinion only.
