I was wondering if there are problems with putting share buttons at the top and the bottom of the post. Reason is that some people share on the top, and others at the bottom.

  • 2
    What sort of site is this for (news, blog, ecommerce, insurance site)? Can you expand on this question a bit more so we've got more to work from? While the answer may well be the same regardless of the site, providing more details will help future visitors to this site when they're searching for specific issues.
    – JonW
    May 18, 2012 at 9:10
  • Maybe this will best answer your question. ux.stackexchange.com/questions/9969/… May 18, 2012 at 9:10
  • It's for a blog that contains images/design/art etc. So some people want to share the post at the top, because they like it at first sight.. others check out the whole post and when they're at the bottom, might want to share, instead of scrolling back up.
    – Joost
    May 18, 2012 at 9:13

3 Answers 3


Reading your comment above, I believe that as a reader, you should only share something that you have fully considered the value of and have concluded that it is of interest to others and worth sharing.

So, putting share buttons at the top because they like it at first sight does not fall into this category, whereas those that check out the whole post and when they're at the bottom, might want to share would result in a more useful sharing practice.

However, that's not to say you should not actually put them at the top!

If the layout of the page is such that you can put the social buttons more discretely (smaller, less text) at the top, and more prominently at the bottom of the blog article (larger, 'Share this page' for example), then that's a great balance for many situations. Plenty of popular high profile blog/news sites do exactly this.

In your mind, understand the way in which top-of-page sharing and bottom-of-page sharing actually gets used. Include it for the right reasons and to promote responsible sharing, and the design should follow.

On a side-note - if the articles are long, include a discrete back-to-top link at the bottom of the article, and the comments - for example as seen on Smashing Magazine

You should be able to easily count the relative usage of top and bottom sharing, and you can A/B test with/without the back-to-top link and see the difference in whether more people then use the top share after clicking it. Use real data to affect ongoing design changes.


You can also consider having the share buttons float along the side of the article so that it never leaves the user's view. That way, they can share at the beginning if they find it valuable "at first sight," somewhere in the middle or at the end. I like Mashable's implementation:

See any article for reference: http://mashable.com/2012/05/18/facebook-ipo-closing-day-price/

  • This is probably the best solution. Sometime I'll read something in my reader, like it, then click through to the main site to share, or halfway through an article will find something that makes me want to share it. Mar 21, 2013 at 18:46

Who says you have to make a choice? Many blogs and news sites these days have 'sticky' social media toolbars that stay in fixed position as the user scrolls the document. These allow users to always discover the social buttons, and to share the document as soon as it proves interesting.

If that's not possible, then it depends on how you expect your content to be consumed. Are your users only going to qualify that something is share-worthy once they've read the post? Stick it at the bottom. Is there content at the top which immediately qualifies the article as worthy of sharing? Upper controls may be better. Consider performing an A/B test, trying out both variations and tracking the number of shares, to find the best choice for your circumstances.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.