I think it can be pretty safely agreed that in-person research is better than remote research.

It should also be fairly clear however that remote research is usually cheaper than in-person research.

I wonder; has there ever been an attempt to compare the relative costs and benefits of the two?

I know this has been done in areas such as how many participants you should have when usability testing, with the cost to reward famously trailing off after about 5 people.

Of course, in practice there’s a huge amount of considerations to make about whether remote or in person is the right choice for the particular research you are running and there will never be a single correct answer. But any attempts at trying to find some numbers in some given situations would be very interesting to see.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.