In general, what would be the order of developing a product? Is there any suggestion that we do the competitive analysis first or comparative first? or at the same time if needed? And what are the pros and cons?

  • How do you differentiate comparative and competitive analysis? Commented Sep 17, 2018 at 0:54
  • 1
    To my understanding, competitive analysis is to review potential competitors and noting key features and different solutions while comparative analysis is with a focus outside of the shared market space. A comparative analysis focuses instead on products that share similar experience attributes regardless of industry or product type. Commented Sep 17, 2018 at 6:33
  • Thanks for the clarification. The order would depend on the specific context of the product / service being researched and your objectives. I don't think you can establish a general rule. Commented Sep 17, 2018 at 17:45
  • @Hsiao-anWu Interesting. I always included non-competitors in a competitive analysis. The point is to see how others do what you're trying to do, so who's doing it never mattered that much to me. Commented Sep 18, 2018 at 15:43
  • I agree with both comments above. Both belong to the discovery and research phase of the project cycle. You are trying to learn everything about the project at this point, so no specific first or second, they can be done in parallel. You are collecting different learnings at this point, which will all feed to your analysis later on. You might find similarities between competitors and ideas from other industries, which may or may not be related, but all those findings are added to the same "learnings" pool.
    – Nicolas
    Commented Oct 18, 2018 at 15:17

1 Answer 1


Ideally you would probably end up doing both as part of your research, so assuming you do them at around the same time it will not really make too much different the order that you carry them out.

The reason for this is because theoretically you are looking for related but similar information from the results of your comparative and competitive analysis. The comparative analysis is about trying to find similarities and differences in products and services of similar features (regardless of industry or product type), while the competitive analysis is more focused on competitors in the same market. Ultimately it will help you determine what are the unique selling proposition for your product and/or service, so it makes sense for you to be as thorough and comprehensive as you can (hence you tend to do both).

I would say that from a business stakeholder's point of view the competitor analysis is seen as more important (higher priority) and therefore this may often be done first by the business analyst. From a UX designer's perspective it may be more important to do the comparative analysis to get a better idea of the types of experiences and help you come up with some insights for designing the product/service.

However, as I mentioned previously, both are important to do as part of your research, and as long as they are carried out at around the same time and also at a sensible stage of the project, I don't think there is too much difference which one you do first.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.