My software company is beginning to implement "intelligent" query capabilities to the usual search boxes for our customers and I think that this necessitates the need to evolve from the old standard magnifying glass icon to something else.

For example, consider the search box right here on Stack Exchange:

Search box showing a magnifying glass icon

This makes sense to have the traditional magnifying glass icon because it is a traditional search. However, the same "search" box in some of the applications we currently have in development are "intelligent" or "bot-enabled" which means that it almost becomes more conversational instead of a one-way simple command.

For example, instead of simply typing in "AA Batteries" to see a list of search results, the user could type in "Add AA batteries to my cart, 36 pack" or "Buy 36 pack of AA batteries" and their request is carried out by the smart algorithms.

We are seeing many new requests for this type of thing and the underlying technology is common now and works well (you have probably used a personal assistant today already).

To take this even one step further, we are also seeing requests to enable microphones (speech inputs) to these boxes in addition to text (keyboard). I am not sure if this should be a second icon or if there is some sort of "omni" icon that can serve as a single call to action (in other words, the user recognizes that once they click it they can begin talking OR typing).

In Windows 10, both the mic and the magnifying glass icon are shown when the textbox has focus, but I can't help but feel like there is a better, more unified way to convey the combined capabilities:

'Ask me anything' box shows a magnifying glass icon, button shows a microphone icon

It looks like Google is just using a mic and, as Anthony Hobday pointed out below, people seem to know that the Google search capability does much more than just search:

Google Search box has a button showing a microphone icon

As far as iconography goes, the best I can come up with is either an ear abstraction or a soundwave abstraction to indicate that the system will listen to you:

  • Abstract ear

  • Abstract soundwave

Problem is, this doesn't necessarily indicate that the system is "intelligent".

  • An interesting question, but you should consider rephrasing it to ask "How do we represent that our search has more capabilities" or something of the like. Questions simply requesting icons are closed quickly here as they are not considered to be in scope for this site. Mar 10, 2017 at 17:09
  • @maxathousand - if you have any suggestion on other re-phrasing or different tags for this question, I would be grateful as I really hope to get a great answer for this. Thanks again and happy Friday! Mar 10, 2017 at 17:13
  • 1
    As in the film "2001's" interface with the onboard computer :-)
    – PhillipW
    Mar 11, 2017 at 7:38
  • 1
    I had something like this on an internal app, the text box was always at the center of the navbar, and instead of a search icon it simply had a right-pointing arrow, with a placeholder text "Query or expression" (expression could be actual code that would be executed on the backend server) - I think this could be applied to the general public by replacing the placeholder with something like "What do you want me to do?" and providing examples in the suggestions dropdown upon focusing the field. Mar 11, 2017 at 11:56
  • 1
    @LightnessRacesinOrbit- With respect, I believe you are in the minority with regards to your opinion and additionally, you have used smart algorithms even if they weren't explicitly "personal assistants" without realizing it, I guarantee you. The only difference now is that we are starting to make the user aware of such algorithms so that they can make better use of them. Mar 11, 2017 at 16:13

5 Answers 5


Use a small stylised graphic of a persons face / head and shoulders next to the search box - rather than the magnifying glass.

With increasing penetration of the Siris and the Alexia's into the market place people will get used to being able to interact with 'digital assistants' and the line between whether you are actually dealing with a human or a machine will get increasingly blurred.

You might want to add a microphone icon which appears - in the text box - when someone clicks into it to signify that the assistant is now actively listening.

  • There probably is no "correct" answer to my question, but this is the closest match to the question I asked. Thanks! Mar 11, 2017 at 14:47

Teach the user how to use your feature. Show them example queries to illustrate what is possible. This can be done in some sort of short onboarding experience for new users, or perhaps when the input is in focus.

A feature that is not discoverable might as well not exist.

I would venture to say that this problem is not one that is solvable by simply choosing the right icon. This conversational style is still a pretty uncommon type of interaction, so a user will likely not assume that these types of queries are possible unless they are shown.

Siri and Cortana are more of a "personal assistant" type of interaction, as you're describing. I know on my Windows 10 computer, it provides me with example queries as to what I can do with Cortana. On my iPhone, Siri shows me suggested queries as well.

As for interacting with these assistants, as far as I can tell, there's no hard-and-fast standard for these "personal assistants"--Microsoft made their own icon (the filled-in circle enclosed by another circle) to trigger their assistant, while Apple chose a gesture (push and hold on the home button).

  • Thanks maxathousand! So, basically reveal more instructions when the textbox has focus, like a flyout or something? I also noticed that in Windows 10, both the microphone and the magnifying glass are shown when the textbox has focus. Thanks again. Mar 10, 2017 at 17:46
  • 2
    Also, concerning your voice-search feature, I would make that an explicit opt-in experience (like by clicking a microphone icon) rather than having it "listen" while I'm typing. I could be talking about something unrelated while I'm trying to use the search and don't need/want it to be listening (also, it seems just kind of creepy to have things listen to me when I didn't tell them to). Mar 10, 2017 at 18:54
  • Absolutely agreed. Maybe the mic icon is displayed once the textbox has focus so the user knows they can click it and then start talking. Mar 10, 2017 at 18:57
  • 1
    Instead of going for a generic icon, make the symbology interactive too. The point is that it's more of an assistant than an omnibox, so give it a unique logo with a personality, that pops up an interaction when selected (e.g. have the icon be some kind of personality that displays a 'how can I help you' box when you select it, similar to how websites have the speak with a representative now display, just less intrusive and using iconography that indicates an AI) Mar 10, 2017 at 20:20
  • @AdamMartin--you mean like Clippy? ;) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Assistant Mar 11, 2017 at 2:06

The actions the user will want to perform take this pattern:

object [action]

Search field:

term [search]

"Search for this term" = "this term" [Search button]

Item list:

item [add to cart]

"Add this item to cart" = this item [Add to cart button]

In your case, users will use the text input the following way:

term action [execute action]

As you will need a button for the field, you might find an icon that could represent this "execute" or "run" action, but I am not aware of any convention so probably it would be better to stay away from icons and use text. @AnthonyHobday proposal of using "Go" as the text for the button is a good solution.

If I understood correctly, your algorithm will detect what action the user wants to perform and execute it. If this is the case you could actually fill the button with the action the user typed. This would need extensive testing to analyze all the possible outcomes, but it might be a direction to start from.

About the updated question.

Note that there are two things: The magnifying glass as a hint (that the field/input is meant to search) and the button to search.

Take the example of this UX Stack Exchange site (as it is right now). It doesn't actually have a search button, just the magnifying hint.

In the case of the Google input, the action button is not the microphone but the "Google Search" button. The action the microphone button does is listen and then perform. It also gives a hint of what can be done in the input. My guess is users could associate this hint with "the input can do anything you ask".

In your case the button is not going to listen, it is going to execute the action the user types. So I am not sure it is a good idea to use icons that suggest this kind of actions (talk, listen, etc.).

  • Very interesting approach with regards to changing the call to action text depending on the context. With that said, on some apps I will still need to work through a problem in situations where the textbox is not revealed until the magnifying glass icon is clicked (this is to save space in the header). Maybe finding a universal "execute" icon as you suggest is the solution there, bit it is still back to the original question: what is the best icon for representing the user's communication line with the software? Thanks Avaro! Mar 10, 2017 at 18:47
  • @MattCashatt You are welcome :) A button performs an action indicated in the element. In your case the action is previously typed by the user, so either the action is "perform what I typed", action typed or maybe "send request". An icon for the first one will be ambiguous, for the second one not viable and for the third one there are icons but I am not sure it is the best way to label the action.
    – Alvaro
    Mar 10, 2017 at 19:29

Users are likely to try to use the search box as a search box, no matter what icon you choose.

My assumption is that if someone sees a text field in the top right corner of a website, for example, they will identify it as a search box.

I think an approach you should test is, as you said in your comment on another answer, having an expanded section which is shown when the person tries to search, letting them know, "Hey, search isn't all you can do!".

This could include examples, and a link to a help article explaining the full capabilities of the feature.

As far as visually identifying these features somehow, I'm not sure you need to. Google, for example, has all sorts of features that are NOT search related. I can type "£10 in dollars" into Google, and it will calculate it for me. It shows search results as well, but hopefully you'll do that as well.

My point is that maybe people are slowly becoming used to the idea that a search field doesn't just submit a query and list the results. Especially since the largest search company in the world is leading the way.

Some things to consider trying, if you did want to make it stand out:

  • Change the "Search" button, if there is one, to "Go" or similar. Gets you away from the "Search" concept a little.
  • If you need an icon, consider something like a person speaking. This gives the impression that the person using your site is talking to it, which covers all sorts of interactions.
  • This is GREAT feedback Anthony, thanks! Gives me some great direction! Mar 10, 2017 at 18:18

Well it depends on your clients preffered interaction type. Some clients will need to emphasize more on voice search while with others more on keyboard input. Each client will have different needs because of their different users, and contexts.

So you can divide interaction types on:

  • speach as primary action
  • keyboard typing as primary action
  • equal weight between the two

If it primarily relies on voice commands a speach icon and accompaniyng text affording speech should be emphasized (and vice versa).

Different variations of the text and the icon should be tested with users. You can test this by showing different image variations (.png's) to random people and ask how they think it can be interacted with the search bar. Allow users to look at each image variation for 3-5 seconds only, in order to capture their first impressions of the interface.

This experiment is affordable and easy to run so don't make excuses and test it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.