If John Doe sends you a message via Drop Box, it will be from John Doe (via Dropbox) [no-reply@dropbox.com]
, and if you reply to it, it will be returned to john.doe@aol.com
, and John will most likely read the response.
If John Doe sends you a message via LinkedIn, it will be from LinkedIn Messaging [messages-digest-noreply@linkedin.com]
, and if you reply to it, it will be returned to LinkedIn Messaging <13asd3w4asdfasd52sdfsad@reply.linkedin.com>
, and John will most likely read the response.
If John Doe invites you via LinkedIn, it will be from John Doe (via LinkedIn) [messages-noreply@linkedin.com]
, and if you reply to it, it will appear to be returned to John Doe (via LinkedIn) <messages-noreply@linkedin.com>
, but really returned to messages-noreply@linkedin.com
and John will not receive it.
If you get an email from SurLaTable, it might be from no-reply@SurLaTable.com
, and if you reply to it, it will be returned to no-reply@SurLaTable.com
, and the response will most certainly never be read.
Will people think they could and should respond to emails which are meant to be responded to? Is there anything that could be done to make them feel they could and should do so?