Timeline for Most Intuitive way to organize images into albums?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 9, 2016 at 15:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackUX/status/697074359828156416 | ||
| Feb 8, 2016 at 18:23 | answer | added | Christy James | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 17:13 | comment | added | UXerUIer | So I guess the question is: what's more important to the user? The sense of count, or the ability to view the images in full? Giving count is an easy solution (just show a number) | |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 16:43 | comment | added | Shubham Kanodia | @Majo0od: its not forced, its an expected behaviour. and he need not view thumbnails, its just a solution i thought of, because thumbnails give the user a sense of count. I'm looking for better solutions though ( which may or may not involve thumbnails ). | |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 16:06 | comment | added | UXerUIer | What I'm trying to say is that, then zooming in. Is that a forced behavior (they have to view in full before applying to an album?) or something the user does non the less? If the user has to view a bigger picture, then why are you showing thumbnails to begin with? | |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 15:53 | comment | added | Shubham Kanodia | @Majo0od These are images of scratches on furniture pieces. So they may not be visible without zooming in. I'm afraid that's a constraint i can't change. | |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 15:34 | comment | added | UXerUIer | Why isn't a thumbnail enough? Isn't a thumbnail supposed to provide enough information at a glance that the user doesn't really have to click full view? | |
| Feb 6, 2016 at 13:38 | history | asked | Shubham Kanodia | CC BY-SA 3.0 |