Timeline for Progress bar completing too quickly
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 30, 2015 at 15:54 | answer | added | Ian | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 30, 2015 at 4:21 | comment | added | Mazura | "The progress bar is moving but the remaining time is going up!" –Matrix Runs on Windows XP | |
| Jul 29, 2015 at 13:05 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | @O.R.Mapper You don't need to know. Just don't show the progress bar until a second has passed. If, after a second, the transfer has already completed, don't show it at all. Sure, for large transfers with a progress bar, you won't see it for the first second. But who cares? That's a small proportion of the transfer time in that scenario by definition. | |
| Jul 29, 2015 at 12:45 | comment | added | njzk2 | for starters, make sure your progress bar does not push you other elements around. If real estate is an issue, you can use a different progress bar. can be a simple line, or a morph of the button. something like github.com/dmytrodanylyk/circular-progress-button | |
| Jul 29, 2015 at 12:44 | comment | added | O. R. Mapper | @LightnessRacesinOrbit: Wouldn't the primary issue with this be that you do not know how long it will take (and you can only guess based on what you consider a small enough file size, even though the user's network connection might have a slightly different opinion on the matter)? | |
| Jul 28, 2015 at 10:04 | answer | added | nwp | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 28, 2015 at 9:57 | answer | added | TripeHound | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 28, 2015 at 9:00 | answer | added | David Richerby | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 28, 2015 at 8:27 | comment | added | PlasmaHH | Oh how do I want to punch everyone into the face that makes me wait a bit longer. I had once an upload application that had a ~1.5s "upload finished" animation per file, and then I selected hundreds of small files that all were transferred in fractions a second, and then waited in anger for all the animations to finish. | |
| Jul 28, 2015 at 8:25 | comment | added | BlueWizard | I dont see a problem in this. I wouldn't artificial strech it. Everyone loves fast up- and downloadspeed. When I input a small file I immediately see "Upload completed" which is every information. This is my opinion about this | |
| Jul 28, 2015 at 0:05 | vote | accept | DasBeasto | ||
| Jul 27, 2015 at 23:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/625808830526550017 | ||
| Jul 27, 2015 at 23:10 | comment | added | Lightness Races in Orbit | #3 is fine. Make the threshold ~1 second. | |
| Jul 27, 2015 at 21:32 | answer | added | Nick Todd | timeline score: 105 | |
| Jul 27, 2015 at 21:01 | answer | added | Joel Garfield | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jul 27, 2015 at 20:17 | history | edited | DasBeasto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 234 characters in body
|
| Jul 27, 2015 at 20:12 | history | asked | DasBeasto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |