2 added 320 characters in body
source | link

Of course there are plenty of arguments for and against both sides.

I would put it this way though. "Do you believe that negative-positive placement is the best? No or Yes?"

The point being that "Yes or No" flows better when spoken, which likely explains why positive-negative button order was chosen by Microsoft.

On the OTHER hand, negative-positive flow is often used in rhetoric and debating in order to add weight to the positive argument and keep it fresh in a person's mind. "Do you want to see your children suffer at the hands of the opposing party? Or do you want to vote for our party and secure your future?" And so on.

Of course there are plenty of arguments for and against both sides.

I would put it this way though. "Do you believe that negative-positive placement is the best? No or Yes?"

The point being that "Yes or No" flows better when spoken, which likely explains why positive-negative button order was chosen by Microsoft.

Of course there are plenty of arguments for and against both sides.

I would put it this way though. "Do you believe that negative-positive placement is the best? No or Yes?"

The point being that "Yes or No" flows better when spoken, which likely explains why positive-negative button order was chosen by Microsoft.

On the OTHER hand, negative-positive flow is often used in rhetoric and debating in order to add weight to the positive argument and keep it fresh in a person's mind. "Do you want to see your children suffer at the hands of the opposing party? Or do you want to vote for our party and secure your future?" And so on.

1
source | link

Of course there are plenty of arguments for and against both sides.

I would put it this way though. "Do you believe that negative-positive placement is the best? No or Yes?"

The point being that "Yes or No" flows better when spoken, which likely explains why positive-negative button order was chosen by Microsoft.