Timeline for Support consistency or primary user journey?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2015 at 12:30 | answer | added | Izhaki | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 14:37 | answer | added | Sarah Leigh | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 14:33 | history | edited | Mattias Bregnballe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 381 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2015 at 14:02 | answer | added | Jason Bowden | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 13:44 | answer | added | tohster | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 13:33 | history | edited | Mattias Bregnballe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2015 at 12:55 | comment | added | Mattias Bregnballe | Apple changes colour and placement of the 'cancel' button. Isn't that the same? In my example there are no unsafe actions... Are you suggesting to keep the same placement, but highlight primary action? | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 12:46 | comment | added | Paul S | Do not jumble the order - this would force the user to check and think about the options before every click.. The enabling seems to highlight the important button anyway. In the link you provided, Apple seem to keep the 'safe' option consistently in the same place, and the dialogs are totally different. | |
| Apr 7, 2015 at 12:46 | history | edited | Mattias Bregnballe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 7, 2015 at 12:40 | history | asked | Mattias Bregnballe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |