Skip to main content
37 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 24, 2014 at 7:32 vote accept Renaud
Jul 23, 2014 at 19:05 answer added Steve Wortham timeline score: 3
Jul 23, 2014 at 8:39 answer added Ian timeline score: 0
Jul 23, 2014 at 7:14 answer added Nanne timeline score: 1
Jul 22, 2014 at 17:04 comment added Austin Henley This is a great behavioral economics question! You should try reading Dan Ariely's Predictably Irrational.
Jul 22, 2014 at 15:27 comment added edeverett @kapep If what you're saying is "display shipping costs clearly at the appropriate place" then there's no need to be talking of shady practices or burying information. (The way your original suggestion read was "design the journey so the customer won't realise what the shipping costs are.")
Jul 22, 2014 at 14:58 comment added kapex @edeverett As far as I know the way I explained it is legal; The shipping cost will be calculated either at the cart summary or even only later at the checkout when you choose how to ship. As I said, I consider it shady to hide th costs on purpose - on the other hand with complicated shipping costs calculation for multiple options (express, standard, cod, pickup), combined orders or cost based on weight, the shown shipping costs could be plainly wrong and confusing. Prominently linking to another page explaining all the shipping options is a valid ux approach imho.
Jul 22, 2014 at 13:05 comment added phresnel @edeverett: But that's only for the EU, which accounts for "only" 28 of the about 50-56 states/countries of Europe ;)
Jul 22, 2014 at 12:58 comment added edeverett @phresnel Here's the relevant EU directive: eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/… Here's an explanation of how that must be turned into state law: ec.europa.eu/eu_law/introduction/what_directive_en.htm
Jul 22, 2014 at 12:48 comment added phresnel @edeverett: I think you mistake Europe with a single country or something. There is no "european law".
Jul 22, 2014 at 10:17 answer added Milo timeline score: 1
Jul 22, 2014 at 9:12 comment added edeverett @kapep Not making the cost of a purchase clear to the customer before they make their purchase is illegal in Europe. Probably other places too.
Jul 22, 2014 at 8:50 answer added Gareth Ashworth - MetaPack timeline score: 1
Jul 21, 2014 at 21:49 answer added Luis timeline score: 0
Jul 21, 2014 at 21:22 answer added Dan Is Fiddling By Firelight timeline score: 0
Jul 21, 2014 at 18:32 answer added Jason A. timeline score: 2
Jul 21, 2014 at 18:17 comment added Charles Wesley related: ux.stackexchange.com/questions/35129/…
Jul 21, 2014 at 17:04 comment added Simon Richter There is a difference in the final price once I buy multiple items and shipping can be combined.
Jul 21, 2014 at 16:37 answer added ChrisLively timeline score: 1
Jul 21, 2014 at 16:12 comment added Renaud @CodeMaverick The price of any product is defined by its cost : raw materials, transformation, packaging. It doesn't seem that shady to include the regular shipping cost in it
Jul 21, 2014 at 15:58 comment added phresnel @CodeMaverick: It is, yes. Some retailers here sometimes even advertise like "no taxes this weekend". I can tell you it's not like they have a special deal with Angela Merkel or something :D
Jul 21, 2014 at 15:50 comment added Code Maverick Yea ... I understand how it works. I just think it's shady.
Jul 21, 2014 at 15:44 comment added phresnel @CodeMaverick: Welcome to the business world. There are no unjacked prices, you always pay everything: B2C-Shipping, B2B-Shipping, Advertisement, R&D, Underpriced Prestige Products, Price Fights even, Stocking, Salaries, Telco Bills, Customs, Taxes, Compensation for Workers being Killed by Collapsing Manufactures, Bribery, Owner's Hobbies, etc etc. Business is Blending, often even at the price of health, but I am going to far now.
Jul 21, 2014 at 15:42 comment added Michael @kapep I categorically refused to do business with companies which practice this.
Jul 21, 2014 at 15:32 comment added kapex There is a third option, which is shady but in practice the most commonly found way to deal with this: Don't show any shipping cost next to prices - bury them deep in your help or terms page so the user won't even be reminded that he has to pay for shipping until he's about to confirm the order.
Jul 21, 2014 at 15:29 comment added Steve Dodier-Lazaro What about free shipping thresholds that avoid bloating the price of cheap items and allow users to feel that they're "not paying" shipping? Also, some people incite consumers to buy more to "benefit" from it which may or may not increase sales (e.g. "50€ - 10€ shipping, X more € to qualify for free shipping")
Jul 21, 2014 at 15:25 answer added UXUXUX timeline score: 7
Jul 21, 2014 at 15:04 comment added Conor @CodeMaverick Amazon must be the shadiest company in existence then.
Jul 21, 2014 at 14:46 review Close votes
Jul 21, 2014 at 18:58
Jul 21, 2014 at 14:31 comment added Neil Kirk @CodeMaverick How else can "free" shipping be paid for?
Jul 21, 2014 at 14:30 comment added Code Maverick Based on your example, that doesn't really denote Free shipping. Doesn't that seem a little shady to say it's free, yet, in actuality, you are just jacking up the price to cover the shipping?
Jul 21, 2014 at 12:18 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/491195550528962560
Jul 21, 2014 at 10:00 answer added ceefin timeline score: 0
Jul 21, 2014 at 9:56 answer added edeverett timeline score: 25
Jul 21, 2014 at 9:52 history edited Renaud CC BY-SA 3.0
spell checking
Jul 21, 2014 at 9:36 comment added JonW If ever there was a question screaming out for some AB testing, it is this.
Jul 21, 2014 at 9:34 history asked Renaud CC BY-SA 3.0