3 added 16 characters in body
source | link

A given project requires SUS scores for the current version of a piece of software, as well as the next version when it is prepared, to allow quantitative results for usabilityto demonstrate any usability improvements.

If you're not familiar with SUS, it's the System Usability Scale

Should I use a completely different user sample for subsequent tests?

Is there evidence that users giving repeated feedback on iterations of a system show bias compared to "fresh" users?

A given project requires SUS scores for the current version of a piece of software, as well as the next version when it is prepared, to allow quantitative results for usability improvements.

If you're not familiar with SUS, it's the System Usability Scale

Should I use a completely different user sample for subsequent tests?

Is there evidence that users giving repeated feedback on iterations of a system show bias compared to "fresh" users?

A given project requires SUS scores for the current version of a piece of software, as well as the next version when it is prepared, to allow quantitative results to demonstrate any usability improvements.

If you're not familiar with SUS, it's the System Usability Scale

Should I use a completely different user sample for subsequent tests?

Is there evidence that users giving repeated feedback on iterations of a system show bias compared to "fresh" users?

2 Line spacing
source | link

A given project requires SUS scores for the current version of a piece of software, as well as the next version when it is prepared, to allow quantitative results for usability improvements.

If you're not familiar with SUS, it's the System Usability Scale

Should I use a completely different user sample for subsequent tests? Is

Is there evidence that users giving repeated feedback on iterations of a system show bias compared to "fresh" users?

A given project requires SUS scores for the current version of a piece of software, as well as the next version when it is prepared, to allow quantitative results for usability improvements.

If you're not familiar with SUS, it's the System Usability Scale

Should I use a completely different user sample for subsequent tests? Is there evidence that users giving repeated feedback on iterations of a system show bias compared to "fresh" users?

A given project requires SUS scores for the current version of a piece of software, as well as the next version when it is prepared, to allow quantitative results for usability improvements.

If you're not familiar with SUS, it's the System Usability Scale

Should I use a completely different user sample for subsequent tests?

Is there evidence that users giving repeated feedback on iterations of a system show bias compared to "fresh" users?

    Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/385694821731794944
1
source | link

Should different users always be used for successive System Usability Scale testing?

A given project requires SUS scores for the current version of a piece of software, as well as the next version when it is prepared, to allow quantitative results for usability improvements.

If you're not familiar with SUS, it's the System Usability Scale

Should I use a completely different user sample for subsequent tests? Is there evidence that users giving repeated feedback on iterations of a system show bias compared to "fresh" users?