Timeline for What are some good examples of guiding people through an infographic or interactive, but without it feeling like it's on rails?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://ux.stackexchange.com/ with https://ux.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 4, 2013 at 10:30 | comment | added | finiteattention | Yup, that's one of the patterns we're trying to persuade some clients to go for. Not all have the stomach or budget for a rewrite, but as I see it, it's one of the best ways forward. | |
| Feb 22, 2013 at 17:52 | comment | added | DA01 | Perhaps one solution would be to have web-centric summary content written for each PDF. That way there's web content, but in a succinct/digestible form with a PDF available for those that want to peruse the full content. | |
| Feb 22, 2013 at 12:27 | vote | accept | finiteattention | ||
| Feb 22, 2013 at 12:17 | comment | added | finiteattention | You've kind of nailed it there :) In the field we're in, the extent to which a web presence for this content requires html at all, or should be PDF download only, is an ongoing debate. In general, clients want at least some html presence, in part so they have a bigger digital footprint, but in part because I think they just find a wholly PDF download-focused site rather unsatisfying. Re 'copywriting', clients write and supply all copy; we design and publish in print and for the web. | |
| Feb 22, 2013 at 11:52 | history | edited | finiteattention | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited for clarity
|
| Feb 22, 2013 at 10:23 | history | edited | finiteattention | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited to clarify client/business situation
|
| Feb 21, 2013 at 22:18 | answer | added | Brian | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 21, 2013 at 20:02 | answer | added | Benny Skogberg | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 21, 2013 at 19:51 | answer | added | Mike Rice | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 21, 2013 at 19:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/304672583872282624 | ||
| Feb 21, 2013 at 17:52 | comment | added | DA01 | If this is dense information designed for a printed document, that might be where it should stay--as downloadable PDFs. I think your problem here is one of copywriting rather than one of interactivity. | |
| Feb 21, 2013 at 16:56 | history | asked | finiteattention | CC BY-SA 3.0 |