Timeline for Should I use customized social buttons
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2013 at 21:15 | history | edited | JohnGB♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 15, 2012 at 8:33 | comment | added | ONOZ | Facebook forbids editing their logo. For example, Heise.de got problems for using a black/white version of the like button. | |
| Oct 23, 2011 at 13:51 | answer | added | LisaBarnett | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 21, 2011 at 21:22 | answer | added | Maia Bittner | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 21, 2011 at 15:13 | vote | accept | Rahman Kalfane | ||
| Oct 21, 2011 at 1:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/127189143544532993 | ||
| Oct 20, 2011 at 20:36 | comment | added | c69 | i think, social sites don't wan't their buttons to be customized, because it presumably blurs the "brand image". That's why you should customize those buttons, and for exact same reason - because your brand image should dominate their brand image. | |
| Oct 20, 2011 at 20:36 | comment | added | Zelda | Anecdotally, we use custom social buttons on this site and I never noticed them until someone pointed out we have the buttons. It's unfortunate as ours look quite nice and the standard ones are so...standard. | |
| Oct 20, 2011 at 19:40 | answer | added | JohnGB♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 20, 2011 at 19:35 | history | asked | Rahman Kalfane | CC BY-SA 3.0 |