Timeline for Does having to introduce alternative behavior always indicate poor UX design?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2019 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackUX/status/1191414948401954817 | ||
| Oct 28, 2019 at 13:19 | answer | added | Big_Chair | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 28, 2019 at 11:43 | answer | added | KenDeeter | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 27, 2019 at 0:05 | comment | added | Michael Lai♦ | I would say that having to introduce alternative behaviour isn't always indicative of poor ux design, because most design solutions are only considered within a particular context. When the requirements change, or when you have saturated the potential solutions for a given design pattern, it will be necessary to either introduce new patterns for a specific area of your application or overhaul the entire solution to take into consideration of the entire problem space. | |
| Oct 26, 2019 at 8:48 | answer | added | Chris | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 26, 2019 at 6:11 | answer | added | Wurah | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 25, 2019 at 21:23 | answer | added | Wurah | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 25, 2019 at 20:42 | history | asked | Seu Madruga | CC BY-SA 4.0 |